2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-com.2016.0373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial correlation based analysis of soft combination and user selection algorithm for cooperative spectrum sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1: The covariance matrix Ψ Ψ in (16) can be calculated by taking full consideration of the joint spatial-temporal correlation as (see (17)…”
Section: Impact Of Joint Spatial-temporal Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 1: The covariance matrix Ψ Ψ in (16) can be calculated by taking full consideration of the joint spatial-temporal correlation as (see (17)…”
Section: Impact Of Joint Spatial-temporal Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [16], the performance of CSS in spatially correlated environments has been investigated, and the majority rule is shown to outperform other combining rules for hard decision. Besides, an analytical method has been provided in [17] to evaluate the impact of spatial correlation on CSS when soft combining is used at the FC. Although the conventional user selection schemes show effectiveness in diminishing the influence of spatial correlation, it seems that they could hardly be applied to CR-VANET directly since they are all designed for static scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where s(t) is the PU signal energy transmitted during the sensing interval t. Hence we can write it as [30],…”
Section: Local Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy detection does not require any priori knowledge of primary signals and most importantly it has much lower complexity than the others. Therefore, it is widely applied in cognitive radio networks [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In soft fusion, SUs can transmit the complete local test statistics for soft decision. Soft fusion can achieve better detection performance at the cost of control channel overhead while the hard fusion requires much less control channel bandwidth with possibly degraded performance due to the loss of information [8–10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%