2012
DOI: 10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2012.01.083-104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial data utilization of the agricultural sector for the purposes of agricultural land use change in the case of a selected nature protection area in Slovenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The old paper historical land use maps were first scanned at a resolution of 300 dpi, giving a pixel resolution of 0.088 mm in the case of the military map and the Franciscan cadastre map. If this is multiplied by the map scale, which is 1:28 800 (scale is according to Klafter or Vienna fathom), the ground resolution is approximately 2.52 m. In case of the forest cadastre – in which 1 cm on the map represents 25 000 cm on the ground – pixel resolution is 0.033 mm, multiplied by the map scale; the ground resolution is approximately 0.83 m (Miličić and Udovč, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The old paper historical land use maps were first scanned at a resolution of 300 dpi, giving a pixel resolution of 0.088 mm in the case of the military map and the Franciscan cadastre map. If this is multiplied by the map scale, which is 1:28 800 (scale is according to Klafter or Vienna fathom), the ground resolution is approximately 2.52 m. In case of the forest cadastre – in which 1 cm on the map represents 25 000 cm on the ground – pixel resolution is 0.033 mm, multiplied by the map scale; the ground resolution is approximately 0.83 m (Miličić and Udovč, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much like in the other countries [70,71], where conditions and changes are assessed within sampling blocks or kilometer-large squares, intensive work in the sampling areas ensures higher accuracy, especially concerning the comparability of land use data in different time periods. Up until now, the Slovenian methodology of selection and defining categories of land use was adjusted to the measures of the EU's common agricultural policy, and as a result, the data obtained in the last decade could not be directly applied to the analyses of land-use changes [72]. Based on the acquitted data, however, it is now possible to build spatial models and establish the concepts of landscape structure and the preservation of connectivity between forest patches of urban and suburban forests in order to support the conservation of biodiversity and the adaptation of the local environment to climate change, promoting the green economy and increasing social cohesion for the well-being of the general populace.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miličić and Udovč (2012), Mivšek et al (2012), Lisec, Pišek and Drobne (2013), and Nastran and Žižek Kulovec (2014) also pointed out the deficiencies of the Register.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Register's timeline is presented in detail in the paper by Miličić and Udovč (2012). The key to understanding and interpreting data is to know the interpretation keys (here- To understand the Register it is necessary to know the general instructions for data capture, where the emphasis is on the generalisation of linear structures narrower than 2 m, and the exclusion of details smaller than 2 m, the criteria of merging and connecting polygons that do not meet the minimum illustration criteria, and simplifications and positioning of lines.…”
Section: Data From the Register And Interpretation Keysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation