2022
DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial density estimate of the snow leopard,Panthera uncia, in the Central Tibetan Plateau, China

Abstract: Knowledge of large carnivore population abundance is essential for wildlife management and conservation, but these data are often difficult to obtain in inherently low‐density species. In particular, the snow leopard, Panthera uncia, an enigmatic cat occupying remote mountains in Central Asia, has received insufficient assessments of its population abundance because of logistical and methodological challenges. Here, we aimed to develop a robust density estimation of snow leopards based on 81 days of camera tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2), thereby ensuring a relatively good representation across different strata of snow leopard habitats in the Sanjiangyuan region. Our modeling framework could be further improved by involving prey density as snow leopard density covariates (Suryawanshi et al 2021), as well as covariates in σ and λ simulation (Bian et al 2023). We tested models adding covariates to explain heterogeneity of sigma and lambda; however, the models did not perform well due to insu cient detection number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), thereby ensuring a relatively good representation across different strata of snow leopard habitats in the Sanjiangyuan region. Our modeling framework could be further improved by involving prey density as snow leopard density covariates (Suryawanshi et al 2021), as well as covariates in σ and λ simulation (Bian et al 2023). We tested models adding covariates to explain heterogeneity of sigma and lambda; however, the models did not perform well due to insu cient detection number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%