2001
DOI: 10.1006/jmre.2001.2329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Dependence of a Differential Shading Artifact in Images from Coil Arrays with Reactive Cross-talk at 1.5 T

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We may dispose of intensity artifacts by noting that none of our phantom images display the signal voids which typically arise from reactive coupling; based upon an earlier quantitative analysis [13] we then estimate the crosstalk between neighboring receive loops as below −15 dB. This is consistent with the relatively clean delineation of the receive elements, as seen in the sensitivity maps from an oil phantom (cf Figure 2b).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…We may dispose of intensity artifacts by noting that none of our phantom images display the signal voids which typically arise from reactive coupling; based upon an earlier quantitative analysis [13] we then estimate the crosstalk between neighboring receive loops as below −15 dB. This is consistent with the relatively clean delineation of the receive elements, as seen in the sensitivity maps from an oil phantom (cf Figure 2b).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…However, changing the relative position of the coil elements to modify the size of the coil along with changes in loading associated with different head sizes alters the mutual inductive coupling between the array’s elements. Failure to adequately compensate for the changes in inductive coupling between the elements distorts the spatial profiles of the transmit B 1 from individual coils and decreases the array transmission performance [12]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isolation between the surface coils in the array was evaluated using a small test coil positioned near the center of one of the surface coils (16). The coupling between the surface coils was evaluated by measuring signals at the preamplifier outputs referenced to the signal coming from the array coil with the test coil attached.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%