2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial dependencies of wind power and interrelations with spot price dynamics

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the installed VRE capacity increases, the available supply increases and the parallel shifts are larger, which contributes to the growing weekly volatility. In both countries, the impact can be amplified by highly clustered wind power farms (Elberg and Hagspiel, 2015). However, the average weekly solar power is not found to contribute to the weekly price volatility, which can be explained by the peak-price-decreasing impact of solar power in Germany.…”
Section: Weekly Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the installed VRE capacity increases, the available supply increases and the parallel shifts are larger, which contributes to the growing weekly volatility. In both countries, the impact can be amplified by highly clustered wind power farms (Elberg and Hagspiel, 2015). However, the average weekly solar power is not found to contribute to the weekly price volatility, which can be explained by the peak-price-decreasing impact of solar power in Germany.…”
Section: Weekly Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The results for Denmark suggest that access to flexible capacity via adequate transmission capacity can reduce short-term volatility. In addition, measures such as i) capacity payments that incentivise flexible plants (Hach and Spinler, 2016), ii) dispersing wind and solar power farms (Elberg and Hagspiel, 2015), and iii) integration of adjacent markets (Farahmand et al, 2012) can be utilised. On the consumer side, enhanced understanding of the causes of volatility can be used to design tariffs that incentivise demand response (Dupont et al, 2014), which is likely to mitigate the costs of balancing caused by the intermittency of VRE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative empirical functions from hourly wholesale prices and (residual) load data are, for example, derived by Barlow (2002), Burger et al (2006) and Elberg and Hagspiel (2013).…”
Section: Wholesale Price (µ Yh ) Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We looked at three variables: wind energy forecast F t , wind penetration index WPI t defined in Subsection 4.2 and the residual demand RD t defined as the difference between the total load and the forecasted wind energy production (motivated by [Elberg and Hagspiel, 2015]). We fitted linear and quadratic models involving different linear combinations of these variables.…”
Section: Modified Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few exeptions include [Elberg and Hagspiel, 2015] (copula model for the spatial dependence structure of wind power in Germany), [Veraart, 2016] (impact of wind power generation on German spot prices modelled by regime-switching Lévy semistationary processes), [Ketterer, 2014] (GARCH model of wind power's impact on the electricity price level and volatility in Germany, taking into account changes in market regulations) or [Deschatre and Veraart, 2017] (the impact of wind energy production on the spikes in the spot prices). In this paper we attempt to fill this research gap by introducing a model for both spot and futures prices with wind energy production as an exogenous variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%