2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0264-8377(03)00059-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial development policy: changing roles for local and regional authorities in the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contemporary rural planning in the Netherlands can be characterized by four institutional developments [24][25][26]. First, there exists a tendency towards decentralization, however, within rather tight frameworks of central regulation.…”
Section: Rural Land-use Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary rural planning in the Netherlands can be characterized by four institutional developments [24][25][26]. First, there exists a tendency towards decentralization, however, within rather tight frameworks of central regulation.…”
Section: Rural Land-use Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1399) in Britain, for example, ''y.property as well as planning legislation are still hemmed in the straitjacket of the private law.'' In the Netherlands however, the balance between private and public in accordance with landownership leans more to the public side (Mori, 1998;Louw et al, 2003).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 This developer proposed to develop the plot by itself or to join the area development cooperation. 9 These building claims are widely used in greenfield housing developments (see Louw et al, 2003). 10 The pre-emption right is not violated because there is no transfer of ownership.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, according to some, the project is blurring the boundaries between public policy-making and investing as well as between public and private parties (Louw et al 2003). Combining two responsibilities (public control and public development) could very well lead to conXicts of interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%