2016
DOI: 10.1111/1745-9125.12110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Dimensions of the Effect of Neighborhood Disadvantage on Delinquency*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
22
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
5
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The inverse relationship between crime and UBN indicates that some places that have several socioeconomic disadvantages are not necessarily more affected by offenders: our findings clearly show the inverse association between poverty and crime perpetration. Additionally, socioeconomic disadvantages in surrounding neighborhoods can be inversely associated with offending behavior in the local neighborhood [52]. Thus, crime is not necessarily associated with deprivation in a neighborhood and its adjacent areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse relationship between crime and UBN indicates that some places that have several socioeconomic disadvantages are not necessarily more affected by offenders: our findings clearly show the inverse association between poverty and crime perpetration. Additionally, socioeconomic disadvantages in surrounding neighborhoods can be inversely associated with offending behavior in the local neighborhood [52]. Thus, crime is not necessarily associated with deprivation in a neighborhood and its adjacent areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional limitation includes the absence of community context regarding the areas to which youth return from residential placement and the prosocial skills he or she has upon return to abate the often challenging transition back into school, community, family, and so on. The findings from a growing body of work have demonstrated that the youth's neighborhood, as well as surrounding extended contexts, matters with respect to concentrated disadvantage and affluence, as well as other contextual measures (Crowder and South, 2011;Gaif, 2015;Vogel and South, 2016). The importance of contextual effects has been extended to juvenile offender recidivism as well (Wolff, Baglivio, Intravia, et al, 2015;Wolff, Baglivio, Piquero, Vaughn, and DeLisi, 2015;Wright, Kim, Chassin, Losoya, and Piquero, 2014; but see Wright and Rodriguez, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, relative deprivation exerts negative effects on aspects of behavior which affect the ability to sustain investment in human capital formation. These include impulsivity, self-control, susceptibility to boredom, alcohol consumption (Balsa et al 2014;Mishra and Novakowski 2016), engagement in criminal activities, and passive as well as active bullying at school (Odgers et al 2015;Napoletano et al 2016;Vogel and South 2016). For a more in-depth discussion of the link between relative deprivation and educational attainments, see Esposito and Villaseñor (2019).…”
Section: Relative Standard Of Livingmentioning
confidence: 99%