2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial dissociation between two endogeic earthworms in the Colombian “Llanos”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Jiménez et al 2011). The spatial co‐occurrence of these competitive savanna endogeic species that display opposite spatial distributions by occupying different patches (Jiménez and Rossi 2006) is allowed in the GF. Our results agree with the ‘coexistence aggregation model’ (Hanski 1981, Inouye 1999) which suggests that spatial aggregation of competitors at patchily distributed resources (environment) can facilitate coexistence without species having to avoid one another other by spatial segregation or reduced body‐size overlap (Ives 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Jiménez et al 2011). The spatial co‐occurrence of these competitive savanna endogeic species that display opposite spatial distributions by occupying different patches (Jiménez and Rossi 2006) is allowed in the GF. Our results agree with the ‘coexistence aggregation model’ (Hanski 1981, Inouye 1999) which suggests that spatial aggregation of competitors at patchily distributed resources (environment) can facilitate coexistence without species having to avoid one another other by spatial segregation or reduced body‐size overlap (Ives 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial segregation of earthworms can be the result of species‐specific differential preference for soil conditions rather than by interspecific competition process. Valckx et al (2009) reported that patches occupied by endogeic species were not associated to clusters were anecic species were present, and Jiménez and Rossi (2006) found that the spatial segregation observed in patches of endogeic earthworms may result from interspecific competition. Our findings do not support the hypothesis of inter‐specific competition in the earthworm community of the GF, unlike other studies in the area (Jiménez et al 2006, Decaëns et al 2009), and other deterministic processes (soil environmental heterogeneity) explained earthworm species co‐occurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the importance of competitive exclusion and ecological complementarity in explaining the patchy distribution of species assemblages has been pointed out in the case of earthworm communities (Jiménez & Rossi, 2006; Jiménez et al. , 2006; Decaëns et al.…”
Section: Spatial Patterns At the Community Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2009). In the last group, species segregated in distinct patches (see discussion on local spatial patterns) have been found to have a high degree of niche overlap, whereas species coexisting in a given patch display limiting similarity patterns (Jiménez & Rossi, 2006; Jiménez et al. , 2006; Decaëns et al.…”
Section: Spatial Patterns At the Community Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial analysis by distance indices, SADIE, a methodology helping to unravel spatial association or dissociation of patches of any two parameters (Perry, 1998;Winder et al, 2005;Jimenez & Rossi, 2006), turned out to be a suitable tool in the analysis of spatial avoidance of polluted patches by soil-living invertebrates. In our data, patches of total abundance of soil invertebrates were not influenced by patches of metal concentrations in the soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%