2011
DOI: 10.1134/s1067413611040060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution and mobility of butterflies in a population of the cranberry fritillary Boloria aquilonaris (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other mobility studies on Argynnis or related species report lower mean flight distances than we found, e.g. 330 meters (females) and 200 meters (males) for A. aglaja in the Czech Republic (Zimmermann et al ., 2009), 49 meters (females) and 32 meters (males) for Brenthis ino in Germany (Weyer and Schmitt 2013), and 160 meters (females) and 230 meters (males) for Boloria aquilonaris in Finland (Gorbach 2011). Interestingly, despite the majority of individuals in this study being sedentary, we found, to our knowledge, the longest recorded flight distances in the two studied species in an MRR‐study, 11.9 km for A. aglaja and 3.7 km for A. adippe .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other mobility studies on Argynnis or related species report lower mean flight distances than we found, e.g. 330 meters (females) and 200 meters (males) for A. aglaja in the Czech Republic (Zimmermann et al ., 2009), 49 meters (females) and 32 meters (males) for Brenthis ino in Germany (Weyer and Schmitt 2013), and 160 meters (females) and 230 meters (males) for Boloria aquilonaris in Finland (Gorbach 2011). Interestingly, despite the majority of individuals in this study being sedentary, we found, to our knowledge, the longest recorded flight distances in the two studied species in an MRR‐study, 11.9 km for A. aglaja and 3.7 km for A. adippe .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Abbreviations: Ø , elimination rate; B , recruitment rate; i , number of capture session; m , number of marked ticks; n , total number of captured ticks; N ± SE, daily abundance estimate and its standard error; N total , total abundance for 24–27 May and its standard error estimated with the use of Formula () (Watt et al, 1977) and Formula () (Gorbach, 1998); values for individuals of different sexes (females F/males M) are given in brackets. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the residence rate ( Ø i ), that is, the proportion of individuals remaining in the study area between two consecutive sessions and an estimate of the number of individuals recruited in the area during the same time ( B i ), we may calculate the total abundance N total . The calculation was performed with the use of two formulas: Ntotalgoodbreak=()1goodbreak−M0.25emnormal∑Ni, where M is arithmetic mean of Ø i , ∑ N i is sum of all model abundance values (Watt et al, 1977), and Ntotalgoodbreak=N2goodbreak+normal∑Bi, where N 2 is model abundance for the second date, ∑ B i is total number of individuals recruited since the first date (Gorbach, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%