2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution and temporal variation of methane, ethane and propane background levels in shallow aquifers – A case study from Lower Saxony (Germany)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 25°C, the free-water diffusion coefficient, D 0 , for C 1 , 1.88 × 10 −9 m 2 /s, is greater than those of C 2 and C 3 , 1.52 × 10 −9 m 2 /s and 1.21 × 10 −9 m 2 /s, respectively (Witherspoon & Saraf, 1965) and differences of similar magnitudes have been observed for diffusion coefficients estimated from experiments with a variety of natural rock samples at varying temperatures and pressures (Krooss & Leythaeuser, 1988). Experimental studies measuring isotopic fractionation as a result of diffusive transport in natural rock samples have reported fractionation factors (α 13C1/12C1 ) ranging between 0.9891 (Pernaton et al, 1996) and 0.9986 (Schloemer & Krooss, 2004;Zhang & Krooss, 2001). These values suggest that diffusion may produce fractionation comparable in magnitude to that from microbial oxidation.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At 25°C, the free-water diffusion coefficient, D 0 , for C 1 , 1.88 × 10 −9 m 2 /s, is greater than those of C 2 and C 3 , 1.52 × 10 −9 m 2 /s and 1.21 × 10 −9 m 2 /s, respectively (Witherspoon & Saraf, 1965) and differences of similar magnitudes have been observed for diffusion coefficients estimated from experiments with a variety of natural rock samples at varying temperatures and pressures (Krooss & Leythaeuser, 1988). Experimental studies measuring isotopic fractionation as a result of diffusive transport in natural rock samples have reported fractionation factors (α 13C1/12C1 ) ranging between 0.9891 (Pernaton et al, 1996) and 0.9986 (Schloemer & Krooss, 2004;Zhang & Krooss, 2001). These values suggest that diffusion may produce fractionation comparable in magnitude to that from microbial oxidation.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Although it is recognized that identification of the source for hydrocarbon gas can be complicated by microbially‐mediated molecular and isotopic fractionations (Humez, Mayer, Nightingale, et al., 2016; Loomer et al., 2020; McMahon et al., 2017; Sherwood et al., 2016), mixing between sources (Moritz et al., 2015; Sherwood et al., 2016) and, less frequently, fractionations due to variable gas solubility (Eymold et al., 2018), possible fractionations resulting from diffusive transport are commonly neglected (Alperin et al., 1988; Darrah et al., 2015; Humez et al., 2019; Schloemer et al., 2018; Schoell, 1984; Whiticar, 1999). Recently however, Wanner and Hunkeler (2018) noted the importance of diffusive isotopic fractionation for a wide range of chemical species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bottles were sealed with a Teflon coated butyl rubber seal and were closed with aluminum crimp caps. Dissolved gas concentrations were determined applying a headspace equilibration technique described in detail by Schloemer et al (2018). 25 ml of the water samples were replaced by laboratory grade Helium (5.9) and the samples equilibrated to ambient temperature varying from 23 • to 28 • C (since the laboratory was not air-conditioned) for at least 2 h on a laboratory shaker.…”
Section: Water Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that the low observed methane/ethane ratios found in the depressions at Britta (∼40) are the result of the preferential oxidation of methane compared to ethane occurring during a slow diffusive ascend of the fluid. Equally low methane/ethane ratios were assigned to partly oxidized biogenic gases in ground waters based on enrichments in 13 C isotopes of methane (Schloemer et al, 2018). Propane, which would be an indicator for a migrated deeper sourced thermal (natural) gas, was not found, neither in the samples from the depressions in the Britta area nor in bottom waters at the Dogger Bank seep site.…”
Section: Dissolved Methane In the Water Column And Bottom Watersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to monitor background levels in surface water in regions with frac activities. Therefore, a comprehensive survey has been performed in Lower Saxony (Germany), where the occurrence of methane, ethane and propane in near-surface groundwater of ~ 1000 groundwater wells was analyzed (Schloemer et al 2018). Lower Saxony is the largest hydrocarbon province in Germany, where 327 hydraulic stimulations in 148 production wells at depths of > 3000 m have been performed since 1961 (BGR 2016).…”
Section: Methane Baseline Monitoring In Lower Saxony Germanymentioning
confidence: 99%