1984
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.99.5.1794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution of DNA loop attachment and replicational sites in the nuclear matrix.

Abstract: Biochemical fractionation was combined with high resolution electron microscopic autoradiography to study the localization in rat liver nuclear matrix of attached DNA fragments, in vivo replicated DNA, and in vitro synthesized DNA. In particular, we determined the distribution of these DNA components with the peripheral nuclear lamina versus more internally localized structural elements of isolated nuclear matrix. Autoradiography demonstrated that the bulk of in vivo newly replicated DNA associated with the nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is increasing evidence that eukaryotic origins are attached to the nuclear matrix (13,49) and that DNA replication takes place at the nuclear matrix (12,29,46,55). Several ARS elements, including ARSI and the H4 ARS, bind to the yeast nuclear scaffold (1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increasing evidence that eukaryotic origins are attached to the nuclear matrix (13,49) and that DNA replication takes place at the nuclear matrix (12,29,46,55). Several ARS elements, including ARSI and the H4 ARS, bind to the yeast nuclear scaffold (1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the clustering and nuclear positioning of the DNA sequences replicated at individual replication foci are precisely maintained through the cell cycle and into subsequent generations, so that the BrdU foci persist as discrete structures even when replication does not occur (19,30,40,48,51). How this highly precise and reliable nuclear regionalization is achieved is still poorly understood, although the nuclear matrix is generally believed to be implicated (12,26,40,41,50,51).Both endogenous and overexpressed BCL6 localizes into discrete nuclear subdomains (3,11,17,29), hereafter referred to as nuclear aggregates. Using UTA-L cells, which express an epitope-tagged version of BCL6 upon removal of tetracycline from the culture medium, we previously reported that the large BCL6 aggregates formed upon BCL6 overexpression coincide * Corresponding author.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the clustering and nuclear positioning of the DNA sequences replicated at individual replication foci are precisely maintained through the cell cycle and into subsequent generations, so that the BrdU foci persist as discrete structures even when replication does not occur (19,30,40,48,51). How this highly precise and reliable nuclear regionalization is achieved is still poorly understood, although the nuclear matrix is generally believed to be implicated (12,26,40,41,50,51).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nuclear lamina was purified with the same procedure employed for the nuclear matrix except that all buffers contained 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and the isolated nuclei were digested with DNase I (14 U/mg DNA) and RNase A (80 pg/mg DNA) for 30 min in ice [14]. Aliquots of pm-detergent lamina were saved and the nuclear lamina was obtained with one final extraction in LS containing 0.4% Triton X-100.…”
Section: Isolation Of Nuclei and Subnuclear Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%