2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00254-008-1230-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution of metals in ground/surface waters in the Chandrapur district (Central India) and their plausible sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of animal wastes and wastewater has increased their concentrations in the aquatic environments. Both antibiotics and heavy metals are frequently detected simultaneously in ground water and surface water (Kolpin et al, 2002;Li and Zhang, 2013;Lindsey et al, 2001;Luo et al, 2011;Satapathy et al, 2009). Antibiotics can combine with heavy metals strongly and produce complex species, which makes the behaviors of both compounds more complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of animal wastes and wastewater has increased their concentrations in the aquatic environments. Both antibiotics and heavy metals are frequently detected simultaneously in ground water and surface water (Kolpin et al, 2002;Li and Zhang, 2013;Lindsey et al, 2001;Luo et al, 2011;Satapathy et al, 2009). Antibiotics can combine with heavy metals strongly and produce complex species, which makes the behaviors of both compounds more complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discharge of industrial wastewater containing both contaminants can cause the bio-accumulation in our food chain. Tetracyclines and copper were recently found in surface water and groundwater [3][4][5][6][7]. The simultaneous presence of both has significantly negative environmental impacts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On comparison of standard deviation (SD) values as presented in Table 2, for the results obtained by both these methods, it was observed that there was significant difference in SD values by both these methods (0.91 for ICP and 1.20 for test kit). (Satapathy, 2009) Groundwater iron concentration results obtained by these methods showed that (Table 2) Figure 2, it can be observed that 28 (77.77%) water samples had iron concentration difference between the results obtained by these two methods in the range of ±0.2 mg/L. This difference (±0.2 mg/L) for the results of iron concentrations was observed at lower iron concentration (between 0.0 to 1.0 mg/L of Fe).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%