1996
DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(95)00192-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution of microbial biomass in microaggregates of a silty-loam soil and the relation with the resistance of microorganisms to soil drying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
54
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
54
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies reported a higher microbial biomass in smaller size fractions (27,30,32,58). Our results clearly demonstrated that not only biomass, but also bacterial community structure, was significantly affected by particle size and that smaller size fractions host higher diversities of microbes than larger size particles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies reported a higher microbial biomass in smaller size fractions (27,30,32,58). Our results clearly demonstrated that not only biomass, but also bacterial community structure, was significantly affected by particle size and that smaller size fractions host higher diversities of microbes than larger size particles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Different methods have been applied to study the distribution of organic matter and microbes in the soil matrix, such as electron microscopy (15), repeated washing of soil aggregates (23), and techniques based on physical soil fractionation (6,27,58). Several studies have demonstrated that cell numbers and microbial biomass were most concentrated in the smaller size silt and clay fractions (27,30,32,58).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This differential effect is related to the greater cation exchange capacity and surface area of 2:1 clay particles (Stotzky, 1966), which presumably confer greater protection against desiccation (Bitton et al, 1976;Bushby and Marshall, 1977) than 1:1 clays and oxides. Van Gestel et al (1996), however, suggested that clays do not provide protection against severe drying because water associated with clays is evaporated during drying events. Nevertheless, bacteria were protected in soil aggregates subjected to dry-wet cycles; whereas, fungi were not, presumably because they reside in larger pores and on the surfaces of the aggregates where they are more exposed to drying conditions .…”
Section: Protected Versus Unprotected Microbial Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be attributed to the higher ratio of soil porosity in loamy and clay soils making the conditions more favorable for the biological activities of the bacteria and plant roots, including the biochemical communications between the bacteria and the plant at the onset of symbiosis. Also Van Gestel et al (1996) reported that most of the bacterial populations (more than 50%) were located in the clay soil, in comparison with the sandy soil (only 7%).…”
Section: Genistein (Mm) Leafmentioning
confidence: 99%