2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-019-4355-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution of radionuclides in agricultural soil in the vicinity of a coal-fired brick kiln

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the leaves’ texture and density, a radioactive standard with leafy vegetables was prepared by mixing/spiking 226 Ra standard source of solid matrices in identical containers to the samples, and using them accordingly. Necessary information on the calibration of the efficiency of the detector is available elsewhere [ 41 ]. In this study, each sample was measured for 10,000 seconds to achieve reasonable statistics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the leaves’ texture and density, a radioactive standard with leafy vegetables was prepared by mixing/spiking 226 Ra standard source of solid matrices in identical containers to the samples, and using them accordingly. Necessary information on the calibration of the efficiency of the detector is available elsewhere [ 41 ]. In this study, each sample was measured for 10,000 seconds to achieve reasonable statistics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activity concentrations of radionuclides (Bq kg −1 ) in surface soil, sub-surface soils and plant samples were calculated using Equation (1) [ 41 ]: where CPS represents the net counts per second, ε f the efficiency of the detector, Iγ the branching ratio and W s the weight of the sample in kg. The statistical uncertainties were expressed in terms of standard deviation (±σ), where σ is expressed in Equation (2) [ 41 ]: where N s and N b represent the sample and background counts in time T s and T b , respectively. The total uncertainty for each measured sample was calculated taking into account the statistical and other components of uncertainty.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More particularly, the sample code BHS1A recorded the highest activity concentrations of 226 Ra and 232 Th with values of 12.4 ± 0.7 Bq.kg À1 and 8.8 ± 0.6 Bq.kg À1 respectively, while the sample BHS3B recorded the highest activity concentrations of 40 K with a value of 342 ± 16. However, all of the samples show values lower than the world average values of 35 Bq.kg À1 , 30 Bq.kg À1 and 420 Bq.kg À1 for 226 Ra,232 Th and 40 K respectively as reported by (UNSCEAR, 2000;Abedin et al, 2019).…”
Section: Estimation Of Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…These radioactive elements naturally make their way into the soil, surface water, and groundwater through different earth surface processes [2,6]. Their concentrations increase above normal levels in association with anthropogenic activities, such as the testing of nuclear weapons [2], mining, the production of industrial minerals and materials [7][8][9][10][11], fossil fuel production and combustion [12][13][14], and the use of phosphate and potassium sulfate fertilizers [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%