2015
DOI: 10.2991/jrarc.2015.5.3.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Effect on Public Risk Perception of Natural Disaster: a Comparative Study in East Asia

Abstract: This paper explores the effect of geographical location on public risk perception of natural disasters. By conducting an identical questionnaire survey across three East Asia countries (China, Japan and South Korea), the paper finds out that different country has its unique structure of risk perception. Generally, the risk perception of sample residents in Japan weakens as the distance from the risk source increases, which indicates Japanese people's risk perception reflects the actual risk probability. On the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, risk perception could influence the quality of life as well as the psychological and cultural aspects of disaster-prone areas (Sarrazin et al, 2019).Villagers and wider society should be supported by disaster-reducing strategies, employing sociocultural, religious, political and economic aspects (Aksha et al, 2019;He and Zhai, 2015).When such aspects are embedded in risk perception, they will foster adaptability toward climate change and its implications for potential disasters (Malone and Kinnear, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, risk perception could influence the quality of life as well as the psychological and cultural aspects of disaster-prone areas (Sarrazin et al, 2019).Villagers and wider society should be supported by disaster-reducing strategies, employing sociocultural, religious, political and economic aspects (Aksha et al, 2019;He and Zhai, 2015).When such aspects are embedded in risk perception, they will foster adaptability toward climate change and its implications for potential disasters (Malone and Kinnear, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is more, they frequently present contradictory results. For instance, living in a disaster‐prone area and past experience of disasters have been found to influence disaster risk perception, but these elements do not translate directly into a rise in future risk perception (Jones et al, 2013; He and Zhai, 2015), despite their potential to affect preparedness in a number of very specific ways 7 (Becker et al, 2017). Nevertheless, the assumption that disaster risk perception directly alters disaster‐related behaviour, particularly those activities pertaining to disaster preparedness, has become increasingly contested (see, for example, Solberg, Rossetto, and Joffe, 2010).…”
Section: Disaster Risk Perception and Preparednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, risk and resilience perception are intricately linked. Landslide risk perception has been investigated in communities in South East Asia (He and Zhai 2015;Ho et al 2008), Europe (Antronico et al 2020;Calvello et al 2016), South America (Nathan 2008;Tobin et al 2011), and North America (Butler and DeChano 2012;Peacock et al 2005); yet little is known about the influences of landslide risk perception in Nepal. The purpose of this study is twofold: A first aim is to understand how residents in two highly exposed villages in Far West Nepal (Sunkuda and Bajedi) perceive their risk and resilience to landslides (Section 4.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%