2020
DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial effects on local government efficiency

Abstract: Little attention has been paid to the spatial pattern of local government efficiency. This paper intends to fill this gap by conducting an empirical analysis of a sample of 246 Italian municipalities over the decade 1998–2008. Municipal government efficiency is measured in terms of the speed of payments. Estimation results reveal that municipalities mimic the speed with which public spending is carried out by their neighbours. Political yardstick competition is found to be the source of mimicking behaviour in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(117 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that local efficiency is affected by the characteristics of nearby municipalities because neighbours can affect equilibrium prices in the provision of public goods and services (Skevas & Grashuis, 2019). In addition, natural resource revenue can affect the political competition that determines the quantity and quality of publicly provided goods and services in decentralized governments as well as the efficiency of this provision (Revelli & Tovmo, 2007; Santolini, 2020). To our knowledge, there are no studies that analyse the possible presence of interregional spillovers of external shocks of revenue on a local government's efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is possible that local efficiency is affected by the characteristics of nearby municipalities because neighbours can affect equilibrium prices in the provision of public goods and services (Skevas & Grashuis, 2019). In addition, natural resource revenue can affect the political competition that determines the quantity and quality of publicly provided goods and services in decentralized governments as well as the efficiency of this provision (Revelli & Tovmo, 2007; Santolini, 2020). To our knowledge, there are no studies that analyse the possible presence of interregional spillovers of external shocks of revenue on a local government's efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, there are no studies that analyse the possible presence of interregional spillovers of external shocks of revenue on a local government's efficiency. There is, however, evidence of spillover effects on efficiency at the firm level (Pede, Areal, Singbo, McKinley, & Kajisa, 2018; Skevas & Grashuis, 2019), country level (Adetutu, Glass, Kenjegalieva, & Sickles, 2015; Glass, Kenjegalieva, & Sickles, 2016), regional level (Santolini, 2020; Tsionas & Michaelides, 2016) and local government level (Fusco & Allegrini, 2020; Geys, 2006; Revelli & Tovmo, 2007; Santolini, 2020). This paper focuses on the effect of neighbours' royalties on local efficiency, trying to capture the possibility that more royalties in nearby municipalities affect local equilibrium prices or intermunicipal political competition and thus local efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We adopt the spatial panel data model (SPDM), a flexible model specification approach to capture possible spatial interactions of default risk on local government debts. With extensive availability of panel datasets, the SPDM has been widely applied in empirics of regional science (Almeida et al, 2021; Donfouet et al, 2018; Fingleton & Arbia, 2008; Hortas‐Rico & Rios, 2020; Santolini, 2020). The general expression of SPDM is specified as follows: Riskitgoodbreak=ρji0.3emwijRiskjtgoodbreak+Xitβgoodbreak+θji0.3emwijXjtgoodbreak+αigoodbreak+ηtgoodbreak+uit, uitgoodbreak=λij0.3emwijujtgoodbreak+εit, where the dependent variable Risk it represents the level of debt default risk of city i in year t , which is endogenously determined by neighbouring cities' behaviours, ji0.3emwijRiskjt.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author gives an overview of multipliers for the USA ranging from 0.6 to 1.8. A study related to public spending investigated the relationship in the efficiency of public administration through the speed of payments (Santolini, 2020). The analysis covered the Marche region in the period from 1998 to 2008 and found significant spatial dependence, not only on the level of public spending but also on the speed of spending of public funds.…”
Section: Variables and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%