2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025359
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Genetic Structure of a Symbiotic Beetle-Fungal System: Toward Multi-Taxa Integrated Landscape Genetics

Abstract: Spatial patterns of genetic variation in interacting species can identify shared features that are important to gene flow and can elucidate co-evolutionary relationships. We assessed concordance in spatial genetic variation between the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) and one of its fungal symbionts, Grosmanniaclavigera, in western Canada using neutral genetic markers. We examined how spatial heterogeneity affects genetic variation within beetles and fungi and developed a novel integrated landsca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
54
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
7
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…; James et al . ; Fedrowitz et al . ), the redistribution of photobionts under warmer climatic conditions could indeed rely on the horizontal transmission of locally adapted photobionts, or on the presence of photobiont‐mediated guilds formed by fungal hosts with different ecological preferences and adaptive potentials, but horizontally sharing a common photobiont (Rikkinen et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; James et al . ; Fedrowitz et al . ), the redistribution of photobionts under warmer climatic conditions could indeed rely on the horizontal transmission of locally adapted photobionts, or on the presence of photobiont‐mediated guilds formed by fungal hosts with different ecological preferences and adaptive potentials, but horizontally sharing a common photobiont (Rikkinen et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the degree of congruence between two data sets, for example, between two interacting species, Procrustean superimposition has proven to be as powerful (or even more so) than the Mantel test (Gower ; Peres‐Neto & Jackson ; James et al . ). Procrustes rotation scales and rotates raw data matrices or their ordination solutions in order to find an optimal superimposition that maximizes their fit, that is, minimizing their sum‐of‐squared differences (Gower ; Peres‐Neto & Jackson ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One likely reason for this dissimilarity between C. adjunctus and C. lectularius is that the former is a weak generalist, associated with closely related species [10], while the former is a strong generalist, associated with phylogenetically very different species. Overall, sample sizes and the number of microsatellite markers used were lower in our study than in several studies of C. lectularius genetic structure [34, 40, 41], but were nonetheless appropriate given the much broader spatial and temporal scale of resolution of our analyses [5, 8, 12, 43]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to move beyond link‐based methods we must transform individual‐based pairwise genetic distances into a single Y vector. Landscape genetic neighborhood‐based approaches can use information from pairwise links (genetic distances) to create a node‐based data structure to relate GD patterns to local landscape predictors (James, Coltman, Murray, Hamelin, & Sperling, 2011; Wagner & Fortin, 2013). Here we introduce a novel analytical framework to test whether SGS changed over time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%