2014
DOI: 10.1101/gad.251694.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial genome organization: contrasting views from chromosome conformation capture and fluorescence in situ hybridization

Abstract: Although important for gene regulation, most studies of genome organization use either fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or chromosome conformation capture (3C) methods. FISH directly visualizes the spatial relationship of sequences but is usually applied to a few loci at a time. The frequency at which sequences are ligated together by formaldehyde cross-linking can be measured genome-wide by 3C methods, with higher frequencies thought to reflect shorter distances. FISH and 3C should therefore give the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
233
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
17
233
1
Order By: Relevance
“…20), and a chromatin structure in the nuclear space of single cells, on the other hand, is of great interest and has recently come under discussion (see ref. 21). In this study, we used DNA FISH to show that the two TADs splitting the HoxD locus are distinct chromatin units, which rarely overlap despite their close association in space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20), and a chromatin structure in the nuclear space of single cells, on the other hand, is of great interest and has recently come under discussion (see ref. 21). In this study, we used DNA FISH to show that the two TADs splitting the HoxD locus are distinct chromatin units, which rarely overlap despite their close association in space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of TADs is also supported by 3D-FISH (Nora et al 2012). However, some genome organization revealed by chromosome conformation capture techniques could not be confirmed by 3D-FISH (Williamson et al 2014). The inconsistency would be derived from the technical difference between FISH and Hi-C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Live-cell PWS is a natural supplement to superresolution fluorescence techniques, providing quantifiable information about unstained cellular organization to examine the role of the nanoarchitecture on molecular interactions in live cells. In the future, we envision that live-cell PWS can be applied to a broad range of critical studies of structure-function in live cells, leveraging the multimodal potential in conjunction with existing SRM to study: (i) the interaction between chromatin structure and mRNA transport; (ii) the accessibility of euchromatin and heterochromatin to transcription factors (45)(46)(47); (iii) the relationship between chromatin looping, as measured by techniques such as Hi-C, to the physical chromatin structure (6,16,48); (iv) why and how higher-order chromatin structure changes in cancer (14); (v) the role of nuclear architecture as an epigenetic regulator of gene expression (6,16,48); (vi) the effect of metabolism on chromatin structure (40,49); and (vii) the role of chromatin dynamics in stem cell development (50,51).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%