2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11146-014-9477-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Hedonic Analysis of the Effects of US Wind Energy Facilities on Surrounding Property Values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Perceived negative socioeconomic impacts include reduced property values (Abbott, 2010;Firestone & Kempton, 2007;Hoen et al, 2015), decreased tourism (Landry et al, 2012;Lilley et al, 2010;Lutzeyer, 2013), increased traffic (Slattery et al, 2012), exacerbating economic inequality (Walker et al, 2014b(Walker et al, , 2014c, impacts to fishing and other recreational opportunities (Firestone et al, 2009), and increased electricity rates (Baxter et al, 2013). Impacts on electricity rates are seen as a two-sided coin, with supporters citing reduced rates and opponents citing increased rates (Firestone et al, 2012a).…”
Section: Socioeconomic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Perceived negative socioeconomic impacts include reduced property values (Abbott, 2010;Firestone & Kempton, 2007;Hoen et al, 2015), decreased tourism (Landry et al, 2012;Lilley et al, 2010;Lutzeyer, 2013), increased traffic (Slattery et al, 2012), exacerbating economic inequality (Walker et al, 2014b(Walker et al, , 2014c, impacts to fishing and other recreational opportunities (Firestone et al, 2009), and increased electricity rates (Baxter et al, 2013). Impacts on electricity rates are seen as a two-sided coin, with supporters citing reduced rates and opponents citing increased rates (Firestone et al, 2012a).…”
Section: Socioeconomic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impacts on electricity rates are seen as a two-sided coin, with supporters citing reduced rates and opponents citing increased rates (Firestone et al, 2012a). Although nationwide and state-level studies in the United States have not found evidence of consistent, measurable, or significant reductions in home values near operating wind facilities (Hoen & AtkinsonPalombo, 2016;Hoen et al, 2015;Lang et al, 2014), the perception or belief of property value impacts may still affect acceptance of wind (Abbott, 2010;Walker et al, 2014a). Additionally, there is evidence that home-value effects might exist in the U.S. (Heintzelman & Tuttle, 2012) and Canadian contexts, and there is growing evidence that effects exist in the European context (e.g.…”
Section: Socioeconomic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Physical danger can arise during the winter when icicles fall down from turbines [74•]. Concerns for a devaluation of land and decreasing property prices tend to rank higher in public opinion polls in developed countries [95,96], see also [97,98].…”
Section: Negative Externalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from these studies are mixed, with studies for North America generally finding no statistically significant relationship between wind turbine development and housing or property prices [111][112][113][114], but studies for several European countries finding evidence of a negative relationship [115][116][117][118]. These differences in the findings between European and US studies suggest that people in the USA are generally less disturbed by wind power plants located near their houses than people living in Europe.…”
Section: Landscape and Noise Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%