2015
DOI: 10.1186/s40555-015-0130-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial heterogeneity of benthic copepods: a comparative aspect on composition, abundance, and correlation

Abstract: Background: Comparing meiofaunal assemblages in the seagrass zone with bare sediment will provide information on the structuring factors and phytal preferences of meiobenthic invertebrates since differences in density and diversity of meiofauna are to be expected between vegetated and bare zones. Results: A total of 11 groups of meiofauna, with harpacticoids dominating (51 %) and comprising 48 species within 14 families, have been identified. At all localities, the following harpacticoids were found to be rela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among meiobenthic organisms, crustaceans were found to be the second most abundant taxon in the MPA of Portofino [9] with a faunal composition comparable to other hard bottoms of the Mediterranean Sea [6,58]. The copepod fauna was dominated by the families Miraciidae, Laophontidae, Longipediidae and Thalestridae that are typically found in phytal habitats [13]. It was interesting to observe that some of the species found in Portofino matched with a species list reported from the Indian Ocean that underlines a high occurrence of cosmopolitan species in the study area and the existence of isocommunities in similar habitats, here hard rock substrates vs. dead coral debris [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among meiobenthic organisms, crustaceans were found to be the second most abundant taxon in the MPA of Portofino [9] with a faunal composition comparable to other hard bottoms of the Mediterranean Sea [6,58]. The copepod fauna was dominated by the families Miraciidae, Laophontidae, Longipediidae and Thalestridae that are typically found in phytal habitats [13]. It was interesting to observe that some of the species found in Portofino matched with a species list reported from the Indian Ocean that underlines a high occurrence of cosmopolitan species in the study area and the existence of isocommunities in similar habitats, here hard rock substrates vs. dead coral debris [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Copepoda is one of the largest sub-classes of crustaceans, dominant numerically and also from the point of view of biomass both in the pelagic and benthic domains [12,13]. It is hypothesized that the ancestor of many families of copepods, which are now exploiting phytal or planktonic habitats, had an epibenthic lifestyle [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Bray-Curtis dissimilarity is robust to nonlinearities and has been found to exhibit good performance when analyzing categorical or binary data (Beals 1984) or dealing with data that have many dimensions of zero values (Field et al 1982). The Bray-Curtis dissimilarity algorithm has been used in many types of research on cluster studies or for a community division (Anderson et al 2016;Jayabarathi et al 2015). Ward's method that uses a hierarchical algorithm can further be used for agglomerative clusters, which is commonly used in bibliometrics studies for hierarchical analysis (e.g., Lee and Jeong 2008;Liu et al 2016).…”
Section: Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, amphipods are known for their species‐specific associations with algae, sponges and ascidians, including within coral rubble where they benefit from enhanced resources and shelter (Bahrndorff & Løfstedt, 2004; Darwin & Krapp‐Schickel, 2011; Fraser, Stuart‐Smith, et al, 2020; Martínez‐Laiz et al, 2018; Thomas & Klebba, 2007; White & Reimer, 2012a, 2012b). Harpacticoid copepods are commonly found in high abundance in association with turf and macroalgae (Jayabarathi et al, 2015; Kramer et al, 2012), which are enriched with the particulate organic matter on which they feed (Buffan‐Dubau et al, 1996; Buffan‐Dubau & Carman, 2000). There is little empirical information to help explain why other taxa (e.g., micromolluscs: Pyramidellidae and Rissoellidae) exhibited positive relationships with macroalgae, but it can be assumed that motile cryptofauna generally benefit from increased resources in the microphytobenthos and/or added microhabitat complexity (Fraser, Lefcheck, et al, 2020; Kramer et al, 2017; Poore et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%