“…These standards need to overcome the problems of nonstoichiometric ablation, aerosol transport, atomization, ionization, and instrument signal dri during the analysis of PM 2.5 using LA-ICP-MS, which are still the main defects that hinder the accuracy and precision of this technology. [17][18][19] In recent years, multiple quantitative analysis methods have been reported, including external calibration with or without internal standardization, solution-based calibration, and isotope dilution. [20][21][22][23] In general, external calibration strategy using solid certied materials (CRMs) that match the composition of an actual sample is the most reliable quantitative analysis method for LA-ICP-MS.…”