2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Intelligence of University Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the scores the participants received in spatial visualization test did not differ significantly according to gender. This was a result in parallel to the ones obtained in other studies in the literature (Abay et al 2018;Korkmaz and Tekin, 2020;Özcan et al, 2016;Prokýšek and Štípek, 2016;Sherman, 1980;Turgut and Yenilmez, 2012;Turgut and Yılmaz, 2012;Yurt and Tünkler, 2016). However, Battista (1990) states that although spatial visualization makes a significant contribution to learning geometry, it makes different contributions to male and female performances.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Also, the scores the participants received in spatial visualization test did not differ significantly according to gender. This was a result in parallel to the ones obtained in other studies in the literature (Abay et al 2018;Korkmaz and Tekin, 2020;Özcan et al, 2016;Prokýšek and Štípek, 2016;Sherman, 1980;Turgut and Yenilmez, 2012;Turgut and Yılmaz, 2012;Yurt and Tünkler, 2016). However, Battista (1990) states that although spatial visualization makes a significant contribution to learning geometry, it makes different contributions to male and female performances.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%