2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial interaction effects on inland distribution of maritime flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this variable is expressed in logarithms, the coefficient would represent an elasticity, as explained in Wooldridge (2018, chapter 17). Some examples with a loglinear formulation of exports can be found in Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2006) or Moura et al (2019).…”
Section: Estimation Strategy: Capturing Brazilian Spatial Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this variable is expressed in logarithms, the coefficient would represent an elasticity, as explained in Wooldridge (2018, chapter 17). Some examples with a loglinear formulation of exports can be found in Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2006) or Moura et al (2019).…”
Section: Estimation Strategy: Capturing Brazilian Spatial Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other scholars analysed the trade patterns of port hinterlands (Debrie & Guerrero, 2008; Ferrari et al, 2011) and the role of port infrastructure in the international trade orientation of regions (Bottasso et al, 2018; Wilson et al, 2005). In particular, Márquez‐Ramos (2016) and Moura et al (2019) looked at the role of regional spillovers and economic size in explaining the intensity of provincial maritime flows.…”
Section: The Complexity Of Port‐city Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, integrating transport and regional development is important in the literature of economic geography (Fujita et al, 1999). In particular, as maritime transport through ports has become the major transportation mode in international trade after the rise of GVC (Amador and Cabral, 2016;Jacobs et al, 2010), recent studies on port and port regions have renewed the significance of the interdependence between transport and the economic performance of regions (Bottasso et al, 2018;Ducruet and Itoh, 2016;Moura et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2020;Qi et al, 2020). Starting from the idea of ports providing a comparative advantage to the economic activities of neighboring regions (Fujita and Mori, 1996), scholars tried to prove that ports function as an important infrastructure endowment to promote international trade and investment and facilitate regional development.…”
Section: Port and Regional Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the list of products at a port is not just a piled prod-ucts but a product, in which a knowledge for being connect to the global market is embedded. In this regard, a port is also a knowledge hub through which information and knowledge associated with the global market or the GPNs embodied in commodity flow (Bottasso et al, 2018;Ducruet and Itoh, 2016;Moura et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2020;Qi et al, 2020). With consideration of a port as a knowledge hub, Ducruet and Itoh (2016) investigated the links between commodity types of port traffic and economic activity types in port regions.…”
Section: Port and Regional Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%