“…Their final results demonstrated similar performances with both approaches, showing that the geomorphology‐based inversion approach is as reliable as the spatial proximity approach. Different from the regionalization comparison studies, the studies on the spatial proximity approach combining with other regionalization methods like physical similarity (Razavi & Coulibaly, 2017), regression‐based (Castellarin et al, 2018; Steinschneider, Yang, & Brown, 2015) method, as well as new techniques such as data assimilation (Pugliese et al, 2018), machine learning (Hong, Zhang, Wang, Qian, & Hu, 2017), have also gradually appeared in the last decade. At the same time, new improvements based on traditional spatial proximity approaches such as three‐dimensional canonical Kriging (Castellarin, 2014) and the streamflow–streamflow (Q–Q) method (Andréassian, Lerat, Le Moine, & Perrin, 2012) showed good performance in some areas, which needs further evaluation.…”