2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial interpretability of time-frequency relevance optimized in motor imagery discrimination using Deep&Wide networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, to reduce the low SNR phenomenon in subjects performing poor motor imagery tasks, more elaborate feature extraction methods are to be investigated. One more issue of consideration is to explore the effectiveness of the developed approach for artifact removal in modern architectures of deep learning [ 15 ]. Moreover, eye-tracking and cognitive psychological attention test data could be of benefit to enhance our artifact removal approach and favor both BCI performance and interpretability [ 66 , 67 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, to reduce the low SNR phenomenon in subjects performing poor motor imagery tasks, more elaborate feature extraction methods are to be investigated. One more issue of consideration is to explore the effectiveness of the developed approach for artifact removal in modern architectures of deep learning [ 15 ]. Moreover, eye-tracking and cognitive psychological attention test data could be of benefit to enhance our artifact removal approach and favor both BCI performance and interpretability [ 66 , 67 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, capturing neural activity from the scalp faces several restrictions: non-stationarity and nonlinearity of EEG data [ 11 ], a low-spatial resolution that may also affect the time-resolution [ 12 ], and the inter- and intra-subject variability for which the distribution of features extracted from time-variant brain patterns across subjects can be different for the same tasks [ 13 ]. All those factors result in low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) phenomena, posing a challenge in EEG analysis [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. SNR values, in general, are affected by several factors [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of average accuracy, ESSDM-FTFG-CapsNet achieves the highest accuracy of 85.8% and kappa of 0.84 with fewer layers, which is better than the baseline models. Especially, the average accuracy is 12.1% higher than the ORDW [5] with optimal subject-specific network parameters and slightly deteriorated with the MSFT [1] model. ESSDM-FTFG-CapsNet does not change any hyper-parameters when testing all subjects.…”
Section: A Performance Comparison With Specific-subject Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Table III demonstrates the classification performance (AC-Cavg, kappa, and p-values) following 10-fold cross-validation for proposed ESSDM and SWD with the state-of-the-art models on the BCI IV-2a dataset (four classes). The following baseline models were utilized for performance comparison: sparse filter band common spatial pattern (SFBCSP) [12], compact convolutional recurrent neural network (SCCRNN) [37], ORDW [5], metric-based spatial filtering transformer (MSFT) [1], convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM) [37], Global [38], and MS-AMF [3]. For a more reasonable method analysis, these four types of imagination classes are first paired for bi-classification.…”
Section: A Performance Comparison With Specific-subject Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation