2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial multi-criteria decision analysis for modelling suitable habitats of Ornithodoros soft ticks in the Western Palearctic region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The validation of knowledge-driven models like MCDA is very challenging because of the absence of complete epidemiological data, which in itself is often a driving factor to why the MCDA approach is used in the first place. Despite this challenge, spatial MCDA has been validated in several studies in different countries and on different diseases (for example avian influenza in Asia and African swine fever and Rift valley fever in Africa), underlining the benefit of using this method for risk-based surveillance [22,23,[34][35][36]. In our study, the visual comparison of risk maps with serological results from the field showed that most of the sampled areas with negative results were at low risk of IDV occurrence whereas the positive samples were in high and low risk areas of the maps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validation of knowledge-driven models like MCDA is very challenging because of the absence of complete epidemiological data, which in itself is often a driving factor to why the MCDA approach is used in the first place. Despite this challenge, spatial MCDA has been validated in several studies in different countries and on different diseases (for example avian influenza in Asia and African swine fever and Rift valley fever in Africa), underlining the benefit of using this method for risk-based surveillance [22,23,[34][35][36]. In our study, the visual comparison of risk maps with serological results from the field showed that most of the sampled areas with negative results were at low risk of IDV occurrence whereas the positive samples were in high and low risk areas of the maps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our range maps are based on historical records, and the majority of collections likely represent areas of established occurrence; however, it is possible that ticks no longer occur in the areas reported. We recommend more extensive sampling of soft ticks across the United States paired with ecological niche modeling to explore soft tick distribution and likely host associations (Vial et al 2018), as has recently been done for O. turicata and O. hermsii in the United States (Donaldson et al 2016, Sage et al 2017). We further recommend that more U.S. soft tick species be evaluated for ASFV vector competence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pigs may become infected by ingesting biting flies like the stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans , carrying ASFV [30]. Studies on the soft tick fauna in the Paleartic region identified species that could be ASFV vectors [3133]. However, limited information exists on the vector competence of Palearctic soft tick species for ASFV strains currently circulating in Eurasia [34, 35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%