Spatial Paradigms in Road Networks and Their Delimitation of Urban Boundaries Based on KDE

Abstract

An in-depth analysis of urban road network distribution plays a critical role in understanding the urbanization process. However, effective ways to quantitatively analyze the spatial paradigms of road networks are still lacking, and few studies have utilized road networks to rapidly identify urban areas of a region. Thus, using a fast-developing region in the south-eastern costal region of China, Fuzhou City, as a case, we introduced kernel density estimation (KDE) to characterize road networks and quantified the area’s spatial heterogeneity using exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA) and semivariance analysis (SA). The results show that there is an uneven spatial distribution of the networks both at the regional and downtown levels. At the regional level, there is a conspicuous polarization in the road distribution, with the KDE being much higher in the urban areas than in the rural areas; at the downtown level, the KDE gradually decreases from the center to the periphery. Quantitatively, the ranges of the spatial dependence of the networks are approximately 25 km for the entire study region and 12 km for the downtown area. Additionally, the spatial variations vary among different directions, with greater variations in the northeast–southwest and the southeast–northwest directions compared with the other directions, which is in line with the urban sprawl policy of the study area. Both the qualitative and quantitative results show that the distribution of road networks has a clear urban–rural dual structure, which indicates that road networks can be an active tool in identifying the urban areas of a region. To this end, we propose a quick and easy method to delimit urban areas using KDE. The extraction results of KDE are better than those of the index-based built-up index (IBI), indicating the effectivity and feasibility of our proposed method to identify the urban areas in the region. This research sheds new light on urbanization development research.

Living Structure as an Empirical Measurement of City Morphology

“…The approaches taken in this paper are based completely on the data themselves, and due to these data following a power law distribution these methods can be conducted recursively, as there are similar structures on different scales. The determined city borders and city center borders are based on road density itself; population density or building density may provide different borders, however road networks itself are found to be a good proxy for the actual city edges [37].…”

Spatiotemporal Patterns Evolution of Residential Areas and Transportation Facilities Based on Multi-Source Data: A Case Study of Xi’an, China

“…Using the kernel density tool in ArcGIS software, an analysis of RATFs in Xi'an was conducted for six phases between 2012 and 2022 [35]. The kernel density analysis was performed to detect hotspots and the clustering of RAs and TFs over time.…”

Neolithic Settlement Structures in Central Europe

“…The density of the watercourse is the preferred method of assessing the relationship between human occupation and water courses over the distance to a water course. The approach used is based on methods used to study road networks in modern urban areas (Lin et al 2020). The watercourse density is derived from three individual layers for each of the countries, DIBAVOD (Fojtík et al 2022) for the Czech Republic and Geofabrik for Slovakia and Lower Austria.…”