2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00040-017-0559-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial patterns of relatedness within nesting aggregations of the primitively eusocial sweat bee Lasioglossum malachurum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We should expect a negative correlation between both body size and sociality level with the differentiation between bee populations [30]. Our results showed that L. malachurum, a smallsized social species, had the lowest differentiation values, which corroborates previous results by other authors [58]. This result seems to support the role of sociality in differentiation level, but is contradictory to the role of body size, since small-sized bees tend to have higher differentiation values than larger ones, due to body size affecting their dispersion capacity [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We should expect a negative correlation between both body size and sociality level with the differentiation between bee populations [30]. Our results showed that L. malachurum, a smallsized social species, had the lowest differentiation values, which corroborates previous results by other authors [58]. This result seems to support the role of sociality in differentiation level, but is contradictory to the role of body size, since small-sized bees tend to have higher differentiation values than larger ones, due to body size affecting their dispersion capacity [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Social nesting in this species is thought to be reinforced by the limited dispersal of females from natal nests (Rehan et al, 2014). Dispersal patterns have been implicated in structuring social systems in halictid sweat bees by increasing the densities of philopatric females and varying levels of drifting between nests (Kukuk & Decelles, 1986;Yanega, 1990;Ulrich et al, 2009;Johnstone, Cant & Field, 2012;Friedel, Paxton & Soro, 2017). As such, assessing the phylogeography and population genetics of C. australensis can improve our understanding of both the historical biogeography and the sociobiology of facultatively social insects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial autocorrelation analyses were undertaken at the aggregation and the site level in GenAlEx 6.52 using 999 permutations and 1000 bootstraps [49]. This method has been used to assess spatial structure of relatives in other co-operative species [16,17,28]. It is powerful in that it does not assume a simple linear relationship between relatedness and distance, and as such can uncover discrete clusters of related individuals located anywhere in the parameter space.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altruistic and philopatric tendencies may be in a positive feedback loop with increased inclusive fitness benefits due to altruism leading to increased philopatry and vice-versa [12]. This correlation between fine-scale population structure and cooperative tendency has been demonstrated in several species of mammal [13,14], bird [15] and insect [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%