2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al [51] developed an adaptive frequency feature generation module to mine frequency clues in combination with metric learning for improved separability in the embedding space. Liu et al [56] combined the spatial image and phase spectrum to capture up-sampling artifacts and thereby improve the transferability of deepfake detection.…”
Section: Conventional Deepfake Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Li et al [51] developed an adaptive frequency feature generation module to mine frequency clues in combination with metric learning for improved separability in the embedding space. Liu et al [56] combined the spatial image and phase spectrum to capture up-sampling artifacts and thereby improve the transferability of deepfake detection.…”
Section: Conventional Deepfake Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reasons are the lack of data and ambiguity between deepfake categories. Recently introduced methods, which are trained on datasets [60] with multiple deepfake types, generally have the ability to recognize deepfake generation types [51,[56][57][58]60,63,64,66]. However, these methods lack generalization due to overfitting to few generation methods in the training process and thus cannot be used in practical contexts.…”
Section: Conventional Deepfake Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works aim at detecting inconsistent head poses [105] or irregular eye blinking [66], although more recent fakes may not exhibit such anomalies. More recently, works have focused on attention mechanisms [35,99,110], exploiting the frequency spectrum [41,43,63,70,72,76,89,109], detecting anomalies in features from a face recognition network [101], or using extra identity information [6,33,38]. [44] and [108] use self-supervision for frame-based detection, but do not study the effect of using many real samples.…”
Section: Face Forgery Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uneven overlapping multiplication of two coordinate axes results in the image block similar to chessboard [46], and resulting in a loss of facial texture details. Liu et al [47] observe that the upsampling is a necessary step of most face forgery techniques and utilize phase spectrum to capture the up-sampling defects of face forgery. Since the up-sampling occurs between adjacent pixels, it is advantageous to capture the local information and collect statistics by using small blocks of appropriate size [48].…”
Section: Analysis Of Deepfakementioning
confidence: 99%