2010
DOI: 10.1068/c09163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Planning, Devolution, and New Planning Spaces

Abstract: In this paper we put forward the case for viewing`spatial planning' as a political resource, one which has been largely supportive of the rollout neoliberal approach of New Labour. Drawing on work on postpolitics, we argue that ironically the progressive credentials of spatial planning in terms of consensus building, policy integration, and the search for`win^win^win' solutions may have helped script out oppositional voices. We then outline how the combination of changes to planning systems, devolution, and lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
162
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
162
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, though, it appears as if the pendulum has swung the other way. The emerging, amorphous networks of multi-level spatial (meta)governance that are taking form in Europe often have a very limited degree of transparency and questionable levels of democratic accountability (Swyngedouw, 2005;Allmendinger & Haughton, 2010;Haughton et al, 2010). The building of such semi-formal or informal networks are celebrated by many practitioners and some academics as potent methods of circumscribing and avoiding "administrative clutter" and a way of really "getting things done" (Allmendinger & Haughton, 2009:619).…”
Section: The Kafkaesque World Of Contemporary Networked Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, though, it appears as if the pendulum has swung the other way. The emerging, amorphous networks of multi-level spatial (meta)governance that are taking form in Europe often have a very limited degree of transparency and questionable levels of democratic accountability (Swyngedouw, 2005;Allmendinger & Haughton, 2010;Haughton et al, 2010). The building of such semi-formal or informal networks are celebrated by many practitioners and some academics as potent methods of circumscribing and avoiding "administrative clutter" and a way of really "getting things done" (Allmendinger & Haughton, 2009:619).…”
Section: The Kafkaesque World Of Contemporary Networked Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to The Netherland's National Programme for Spatial Adaptation to Climate Change, spatial planning strategies are implemented through regional governance bodies [31]. Under this model, geographic space is divided into a number of predetermined boundaries [32]. However, to cope with climate change and increase resistance to its negative effects, existing spatial planning should be abandoned.…”
Section: Cross-boundary Spatial Governance and Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Themes have been extrapolated from the literature to frame the empirical analysis; particularly the work of Allmendinger and Haughton (2010. The first investigates the transmission chain of ideas on competitiveness into the policy and planning arenas.…”
Section: Case Study Research Objectives and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial planning, an 'ambiguous concept' (Faludi, 2002) with a 'variety of definitions' (Allmendinger and Haughton, 2010), moves away from narrow regulatory decisions to a broader set of issues. It aims to produce shared principles of spatial development and "new forms of territorially-focused collective action" (Newman, 2008(Newman, , p. 1371.…”
Section: Neoliberalism Competitiveness and Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%