Spatial planning in the programming of urban investments:
            <i>The experience of Indonesia's Integrated Urban Infrastructure Development Programme</i>

Mattingly, Michael; Winarso, Haryo

doi:10.3828/idpr.24.2.1

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Infrastructure deployment has the potential to structure the timing, place and coherence of urban development (Mattingly & Winarso, 2000), but this potential is hampered by deficient planning and coordination of works. Though the unplanned character of urbanisation per se is not an obstacle for servicing, the absence of public action planning generates two main pitfalls: a lack of public space for infrastructure and a lack of knowledge.…”

Section: Uncertainty and Public Action Coordination Deficitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Infrastructure urbanism: Roadmaps for servicing unplanned urbanisation in emerging cities

Criqui

2015

Habitat International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Uncertainty and Public Action Coordination Deficitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Infrastructure urbanism: Roadmaps for servicing unplanned urbanisation in emerging cities

Criqui

2015

Habitat International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The move was fundamentally driven by the need to structure urban areas as centres of economic growth (Soegijoko, 1992b). IUIDP was meant as a response to prior infrastructure development processes, which were considered fragmented, project-oriented, not seen as considering long-term needs and addressing only particular infrastructure problems in the project areas (Hoff & Steinberg, 1993; Mattingly & Winarso, 2000; Soegijoko, 1992a).…”

Section: The Indonesian Sanitation Development Sectormentioning

confidence: 99%

A Decentralised Approach to Wastewater Management in the Urbanising Region: The Case of Jakarta, Indonesia

Putri

2017

Urbanisation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

State-led and market-oriented approaches to sanitation development in Jakarta have favoured the construction of large-scale centralised sewerage systems. This development approach is not always suitable because the principles of modern infrastructure underlying the technological systems are not applicable in informal settlements scattered over the metropolis. Due to spatial fragmentation within the built environment, diverse socioeconomic and fragile geo-ecological conditions in different settlements and the city as a whole, Jakarta needs to adopt a decentralised approach to wastewater management. This article examines governmental dynamics in Jakarta and analyses a sanitation project to introduce improved septic tanks and community sludge-hauling enterprises. The presence of (international) NGOs and civil society organisations is often vital to help communities enrich their technical knowledge of environmental problems and expand their sociopolitical networks. Nevertheless, local initiatives provide a limited response to community sanitation needs and sanitation problems beyond the neighbourhood level. This article argues that the introduction of decentralised sanitation systems requires a new form of state-led infrastructure provision, which involves the (transformative) participation of local actors. In doing so, it extends the notion of decentralised wastewater management beyond purely technological concerns.

show abstract

“…This approach was supported by several international agencies, including the UN-Habitat and the German agency Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit and was applied in Indonesia, Nepal, and India in the 1990s. In Indonesia and Nepal, where evaluations were conducted in the late 1990s (Mattingly and Winarso 2000;Mattingly 2001), the impact of this type of planning was disappointing. In Nepal, investment plans were not updated annually as required.…”

Section: Linking Spatial Planning and Infrastructure Development: International Examplesmentioning

confidence: 99%

New Directions in Spatial Planning? Linking Strategic Spatial Planning and Infrastructure Development

Todes

2012

Journal of Planning Education and Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are growing arguments for linking strategic spatial planning to infrastructure development, particularly within developing countries. This article assesses potentials and challenges of these approaches, focusing particularly on an emerging approach in Johannesburg, South Africa. In Johannesburg, this approach provides more powerful sets of mechanisms than planning has had in the past but is demanding and confronts significant challenges. While linking strategic spatial planning and infrastructure has commonsense appeal, the potential for these approaches is likely to vary contextually, and their role and impact may be more partial than anticipated.

show abstract

Spatial planning in the programming of urban investments: The experience of Indonesia's Integrated Urban Infrastructure Development Programme

Cited by 4 publications

References 2 publications

Infrastructure urbanism: Roadmaps for servicing unplanned urbanisation in emerging cities

Infrastructure urbanism: Roadmaps for servicing unplanned urbanisation in emerging cities

A Decentralised Approach to Wastewater Management in the Urbanising Region: The Case of Jakarta, Indonesia

New Directions in Spatial Planning? Linking Strategic Spatial Planning and Infrastructure Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About