2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial PM2.5, NO2, O3 and BC models for Western Europe – Evaluation of spatiotemporal stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
215
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
9
215
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assigned annual mean concentrations (µg/m 3 ) of 5 different air pollutants—NO 2 , PM 2.5 , PM 10 , black carbon (BC) and O 3 —to each participant based on their geocoded residential history. The exposures were assigned from air pollution rasters developed previously [ 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Annual mean PM 10 exposures were extracted for 2005 to 2007 from surfaces (100 × 100 m) based on western Europe-wide hybrid land use regression (LUR) models [ 31 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assigned annual mean concentrations (µg/m 3 ) of 5 different air pollutants—NO 2 , PM 2.5 , PM 10 , black carbon (BC) and O 3 —to each participant based on their geocoded residential history. The exposures were assigned from air pollution rasters developed previously [ 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Annual mean PM 10 exposures were extracted for 2005 to 2007 from surfaces (100 × 100 m) based on western Europe-wide hybrid land use regression (LUR) models [ 31 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reports [21][22][23] have increasingly pointed to the need for reviewing the impacts of air pollution in the Nordic countries due to the large uncertainties in estimating the effects at low exposure levels. Currently there is no consensus on which shape of the concentration-response function should be applied and whether a threshold should be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained estimates of exposure to outdoor air pollutants at the 1,814 geocoded addresses by applying models available from three projects for baseline (or closest year), and new exposure models for 2017-18. For baseline, we used the ordinary kriging models of NO 2 and formaldehyde concentrations that we had previously devised using data from the passive sampling campaigns in 2010 (Marcon et al 2014). For the same year, we also used the land-use regression (LUR) models for PM 2.5 , NO 2 , and black carbon (BC) concentrations developed for Western Europe within the ELAPSE study (Effects of Low-Level Air Pollution: A study in Europe) (de Hoogh et al 2018). ELAPSE models are based on routine air quality monitoring data for PM 2.5 and NO 2 , and ad hoc monitoring data for BC, in combination with satellite data, dispersion model estimates, land cover and traffic indicators.…”
Section: Exposure Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LUR models based on routine monitors from country-wide or larger areas perform well in the Po Plain (de Hoogh et al 2018;Stafoggia et al 2017) but they may not be ideal to capture variability in industrial pollution. This can in part be attributed to the relatively small number of industrial monitoring sites that can be included at the modelling stage (Stafoggia et al 2017), but also to the fact that spatial LUR predictors are unable to accurately reflect specific types of industrial productions and facilities.…”
Section: Comparison Between Air Pollution Exposure Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%