Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree

Abstract

Preparation of landslide susceptibility maps is considered as the first important step in landslide risk assessments, but these maps are accepted as an end product that can be used for land use planning. The main objective of this study is to explore some new state-of-the-art sophisticated machine learning techniques and introduce a framework for training and validation of shallow landslide susceptibility models by using the latest statistical methods. The Son La hydropower basin (Vietnam) was selected as a case study. First, a landslide inventory map was constructed using the historical landslide locations from two national projects in Vietnam. A total of 12 landslide conditioning factors were then constructed from various data sources. Landslide locations were randomly split into a ratio of 70:30 for training and validating the models. To choose the best subset of conditioning factors, predictive ability of the factors were assessed using the Information Gain Ratio with 10-fold cross-validation technique. Factors with null predictive ability were removed to optimize the models. Subsequently, five landslide models were built using support vector machines (SVM), multi-layer perceptron neural networks (MLP Neural Nets), radial basis function neural networks (RBF Neural Nets), kernel logistic regression (KLR), and logistic model trees (LMT). The resulting models were validated and compared using the receive operating characteristic (ROC), Kappa index, and several statistical evaluation measures. Additionally, Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were applied to confirm significant statistical differences among the five machine learning models employed in this study. Overall, the MLP Neural Nets model has the highest prediction capability (90.2 %), followed by the SVM model (88.7 %) and the KLR model (87.9 %), the RBF Neural Nets model (87.1 %), and the LMT model (86.1 %). Results revealed that both the KLR and the LMT models showed promising methods for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping. The result from this study demonstrates the benefit of selecting the optimal machine learning techniques with proper conditioning selection method in shallow landslide susceptibility mapping.

Do landslides follow landslides? Insights in path dependency from a multi-temporal landslide inventory

“…Quantitative approaches assume that conditions that lead to landslide occurrence in the past and present are likely to cause landslides in the future, thus, the probability of occurrence of future landslides is determined using correlations among various conditioning factors and landslide inventories by statistical methods (Tien Bui et al 2016;Van Westen and Terlien 1996). Deterministic quantitative approaches use detailed geotechnical and hydrological data in combination with statistical models to estimate the probability of slope failure (Aleotti and Chowdhury 1999;Van Westen and Terlien 1996).…”

Improving Accuracy Estimation of Forest Aboveground Biomass Based on Incorporation of ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 and Sentinel-2A Imagery and Machine Learning: A Case Study of the Hyrcanian Forest Area (Iran)

“…SVR has proven to outperform conventional methods in environmental modeling [57][58][59][60][61], land-use and land-cover classification [62], and estimating forest biomass [32,63]. The main advantage of SVR is that it is highly accurate at predicting even with small numbers of training samples [64].…”

“…To construct the MLP Neural Nets model for this study, the number of hidden neurons that has a significant impact on the forest AGB estimation [71,73] was determined using the test suggested in Reference [58]. Thus, by varying the numbers of neurons versus the root-mean-square error (RMSE) using the training dataset, the best MLP Neural Nets models were determined for the three datasets in this study.…”

A Bayesian framework based on a Gaussian mixture model and radial-basis-function Fisher discriminant analysis (BayGmmKda V1.1) for spatial prediction of floods

“…The Wilcoxon signed-rank test is widely used to evaluate whether classification outcomes of prediction models are significantly Bui et al, 2016e). Using this test, the p values that were obtained from experimental results of the four models can be computed using a threshold value of 0.05.…”