Spatial prediction of groundwater potentiality using ANFIS ensembled with teaching-learning-based and biogeography-based optimization

Chen, Wei; Panahi, Mahdi; Khosravi, Khabat; Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza; Rezaie, Fatemeh; Parvinnezhad, Davoud

doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.013

Cited by 165 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Eventually, the accuracy of this research was validated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the results indicated that the landslide susceptibility map produced by EBF-LR model has the highest accuracy (0.826), followed by IoE-LR model (0.825), WoE-LR model (0.792), EBF model (0.791), IoE model (0.778), and WoE model (0.753). The results of this study can provide references of landslide prevention and land use planning for local government.Symmetry 2019, 11, 762 2 of 24years, machine learning method has been gradually applied in landslide susceptibility mapping researches, such as artificial neural network (ANN) [17][18][19], support vector machine (SVM) [20][21][22], logistic model tree (LMT) [23,24], rotation forest (RF) [25,26], classification and regression tree (CART) [27,28], adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) [29,30], and genetic algorithm (GA) [31,32]. Furthermore, statistical approach is another widely-used model which can also be divided into two types: bivariate and multivariate.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Landslide Susceptibility Mapping for the Muchuan County (China): A Comparison Between Bivariate Statistical Models (WoE, EBF, and IoE) and Their Ensembles with Logistic Regression

Wang

2019

Symmetry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main purpose of this study is to apply three bivariate statistical models, namely weight of evidence (WoE), evidence belief function (EBF) and index of entropy (IoE), and their ensembles with logistic regression (LR) for landslide susceptibility mapping in Muchuan County, China. First, a landslide inventory map contained 279 landslides was obtained through the field investigation and interpretation of aerial photographs. Next, the landslides were randomly divided into two parts for training and validation with the ratio of 70/30. In addition, according to the regional geological environment characteristics, twelve landslide conditioning factors were selected, including altitude, plan curvature, profile curvature, slope angle, distance to roads, distance to rivers, topographic wetness index (TWI), normalized different vegetation index (NDVI), land use, soil, and lithology. Subsequently, the landslide susceptibility mapping was carried out by the above models. Eventually, the accuracy of this research was validated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the results indicated that the landslide susceptibility map produced by EBF-LR model has the highest accuracy (0.826), followed by IoE-LR model (0.825), WoE-LR model (0.792), EBF model (0.791), IoE model (0.778), and WoE model (0.753). The results of this study can provide references of landslide prevention and land use planning for local government.Symmetry 2019, 11, 762 2 of 24years, machine learning method has been gradually applied in landslide susceptibility mapping researches, such as artificial neural network (ANN) [17][18][19], support vector machine (SVM) [20][21][22], logistic model tree (LMT) [23,24], rotation forest (RF) [25,26], classification and regression tree (CART) [27,28], adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) [29,30], and genetic algorithm (GA) [31,32]. Furthermore, statistical approach is another widely-used model which can also be divided into two types: bivariate and multivariate. In statistical approaches, the weight of each class of every factor was calculated by overlying the landslide inventory map and landslide conditioning factors map [33,34]. The frequently-used statistical approaches are frequency ratio (FR) [35][36][37], logistic regression (LR), evidential belief function (EBF) [38,39], weights of evidence (WoE) [40,41], certainty factor (CF) [42,43], and information value (IV) [44,45].In this paper, three bivariate statistical methods, namely weight of evidence (WoE), evidence belief function (EBF), index of entropy (IoE), coupled with logistic regression (LR) were introduced to carry out the landslide susceptibility mapping in Muchuan County, which lies in the southeast of Sichuan Province, China. All the approaches were first applied in Muchuan County and the main purpose of this article is to obtain the landslide susceptibility maps through the above models. The main difference between this study and literatures referenced above is to achieve accurate landslide susceptibility maps for...

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Landslide Susceptibility Mapping for the Muchuan County (China): A Comparison Between Bivariate Statistical Models (WoE, EBF, and IoE) and Their Ensembles with Logistic Regression

Wang

2019

Symmetry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although Mahdavi‐Meymand et al . reported that the BBO has decreased the performance of ANFIS, some researchers reported the suitable results of ANFIS‐BBO . Nevertheless, the outcomes of this study confirm the suitability of using all nature‐inspired algorithms in the enhancement of the performance of the standard ANFIS model.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 47%

Seasonal Short‐Term Prediction of Dissolved Oxygen in Rivers via Nature‐Inspired Algorithms

Fadaee

Mahdavi‐Meymand

Zounemat‐Kermani

2020

CLEAN Soil Air Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study challenges the use of three nature-inspired algorithms as learning frameworks of the adaptive-neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) machine learning model for short-term modeling of dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations. Particle swarm optimization (PSO), butterfly optimization algorithm (BOA), and biogeography-based optimization (BBO) are employed for developing predictive ANFIS models using seasonal 15 min data collected from the Rock Creek River in Washington, DC. Four independent variables are used as model inputs including water temperature (T), river discharge (Q), specific conductance (SC), and pH. The Mallow's Cp and R 2 parameters are used for choosing the best input parameters for the models. The models are assessed by several statistics such as the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root-mean-square error (RMSE), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, mean absolute error, and the percent bias. The results indicate that the performance of all-nature-inspired algorithms is close to each other. However, based on the calculated RMSE, they enhance the accuracy of standard ANFIS in the spring, summer, fall, and winter around 13.79%, 15.94%, 6.25%, and 12.74%, respectively. Overall, the ANFIS-PSO and ANFIS-BOA provide slightly better results than the other ANFIS models.

show abstract

“…The landslide susceptibility map should have the ability to verify with existing landslide data and predict future landslides [105]. Therefore, in this study, the ROC curve and the AUC are used to assess the prediction capability of models [106][107][108]. The best models tend to have the highest AUC among the models studied [4,109].…”

Section: Validation and Comparison Of Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Using Hybrid Integration of Evidential Belief Function and Machine Learning Techniques

Chen

2019

Water

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, Random SubSpace-based classification and regression tree (RSCART) was introduced for landslide susceptibility modeling, and CART model and logistic regression (LR) model were used as benchmark models. 263 landslide locations in the study area were randomly divided into two parts (70/30) for training and validation of models. 14 landslide influencing factors were selected, such as slope angle, elevation, aspect, sediment transport index (STI), topographical wetness index (TWI), stream power index (SPI), profile curvature, plan curvature, distance to rivers, distance to road, soil, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), land use, and lithology. Finally, the hybrid RSCART model and two benchmark models were applied for landslide susceptibility modeling and the receiver operating characteristic curve method is used to evaluate the performance of the model. The susceptibility is quantitatively compared based on each pixel to reveal the system spatial pattern between susceptibility maps. At the same time, area under ROC curve (AUC) and landslide density analysis were used to estimate the prediction ability of landslide susceptibility map. The results showed that the RSCART model is the optimal model with the highest AUC values of 0.852 and 0.827, followed by LR and CART models. The results also illustrate that the hybrid model generally improves the prediction ability of a single landslide susceptibility model.Water 2020, 12, 113 2 of 29 weights of evidence [10][11][12], frequency ratio [13][14][15][16][17], logistic regression [18][19][20][21], linear multivariate regression, multivariate adaptive regression spline [22][23][24], and statistical index [25,26] have been widely used. However, these traditional statistical methods do not provide satisfactory evaluation of the correlation between landslide influencing factors [4,27].Therefore, machine learning technologies have drawn extensive attention, and many kinds of machine learning methods have been developed and used, such as classification and regression trees [28,29], adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems [30,31], fuzzy logic [32,33], alternating decision trees [34][35][36], support vector machine [37][38][39], artificial neural networks [40,41], and random forest [4,[42][43][44][45]. In particular, hybrid models are increasingly used, such as the rotation forest-based decision trees [46,47], frequency ratio-based ANFIS model [48], bagging-based reduced error pruning trees [49], and multiboost-based support vector machines [50].Spatial prediction of landslide is not only the first important step, but also one of the most difficult tasks [31,51]. Many modeling methods have been used in the construction of landslide susceptibility maps in the past, but the accuracy of these models has not been accepted by all researchers [52]. Youssef et al. used CART model to study landslide susceptibility in Wadi Tayyah Basin. The result of post-cart model is not optimal [53]. However, when Felicísimo et al. studied the landslide susceptibility, CART shows...

show abstract

Spatial prediction of groundwater potentiality using ANFIS ensembled with teaching-learning-based and biogeography-based optimization

Cited by 165 publications

References 57 publications

Landslide Susceptibility Mapping for the Muchuan County (China): A Comparison Between Bivariate Statistical Models (WoE, EBF, and IoE) and Their Ensembles with Logistic Regression

Landslide Susceptibility Mapping for the Muchuan County (China): A Comparison Between Bivariate Statistical Models (WoE, EBF, and IoE) and Their Ensembles with Logistic Regression

Seasonal Short‐Term Prediction of Dissolved Oxygen in Rivers via Nature‐Inspired Algorithms

Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Using Hybrid Integration of Evidential Belief Function and Machine Learning Techniques

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About