2003
DOI: 10.1093/jee/96.1.156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Processes in the Evolution of Resistance in Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Bt Transgenic Corn and Cotton in a Mixed Agroecosystem: a Biology-rich Stochastic Simulation Model

Abstract: A simulation model is developed to examine the role of spatial processes in the evolution of resistance in Helicoverpa zea populations to Bt corn and Bt cotton. The model is developed from the stochastic spatially explicit Heliothis virescens model described by Peck et al. (1999), to accommodate a spatial mix of two host crops (corn and cotton), and to reflect the agronomic practices, as well as the spatial and temporal population dynamics of H. zea, in eastern North Carolina. The model suggests that selection… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
59
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It effectively assumes one synchronized generation per year, and that year comprises just five discrete processes: random mating and reproduction, density-dependent attrition, density-independent selection, exchange between crop and refuge, and mutation. The big model is described in Appendix 2 and is identical to the deterministic version of the model of Bantle et al [6], which is very close to the model of Sisterson et al [32], and is in the same class as the models of Peck et al [26], Caprio [7] and Storer et al [33]. Following Sisterson, its many parameters are tuned to represent pink bollworm (Pectinophora gossypiella) on Bt cotton in Maricopa, Arizona.…”
Section: The Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It effectively assumes one synchronized generation per year, and that year comprises just five discrete processes: random mating and reproduction, density-dependent attrition, density-independent selection, exchange between crop and refuge, and mutation. The big model is described in Appendix 2 and is identical to the deterministic version of the model of Bantle et al [6], which is very close to the model of Sisterson et al [32], and is in the same class as the models of Peck et al [26], Caprio [7] and Storer et al [33]. Following Sisterson, its many parameters are tuned to represent pink bollworm (Pectinophora gossypiella) on Bt cotton in Maricopa, Arizona.…”
Section: The Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier work demonstrated that Bt cotton could control about 80-95 per cent pests on average in the Yellow River Valley (Wu, 2002;Li et al, 2004). Based on these studies (from China) and empirical studies in the United States (Caprio, 1998;Burd et al, 2001;Storer et al, 2003;Livingston et al, 2004), we assume that the mortality rate of pests with double susceptible genes to Bt toxin is 0.90 in Bt cotton fields. As assumed in Livingston et al (2004Livingston et al ( , 2002, we also assume that the mortality rate of pests with double resistant genes to Bt toxin, the so-called 'fitness cost', is 0.05.…”
Section: Biological Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the prolonged application of B. thuringiensis formulations and the widespread planting of transgenic crops with B. thuringiensis endotoxins have raised concerns over the development of insect resistance (1,12,13,17,23,24,25,26). Thus, alternative insecticidal proteins that do not share a mode of action identical with that of B. thuringiensis endotoxins are highly desirable for the development of the next generation of transgenic insect-resistant crops.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%