2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04070-2_63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Relation Model for Object Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linguistic studies show the importance of spatial representation in language [1]. Our analysis also shows that people tend to use spatial concepts in performing navigation tasks, particularly, when they encounter objects that are similar or unfamiliar in category [2]. Spatial expressions partition the space into loose regions such as near, back and left.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Linguistic studies show the importance of spatial representation in language [1]. Our analysis also shows that people tend to use spatial concepts in performing navigation tasks, particularly, when they encounter objects that are similar or unfamiliar in category [2]. Spatial expressions partition the space into loose regions such as near, back and left.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Representing spatial relationships by a set of numerical features is a challenging problem. We should note that the definition of the spatial reference is an important step for any attempt to model spatial relationships (Colliot et al , 2006;Cao , 2009). In our case, due to the nature of the viewpoint, and because the objects of interest are centered in the image, the spatial reference is naturally selected as the central point in the image.…”
Section: • Grouping Of Edge Points E I Into Edge-chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the handling of such spatial relationships is not obvious since symbolic/linguistic reasoning is more or less involved (Erus and Lomenie , 2005) and the concept of spatial ontology is not straightforwardly usable in current image processing lines (Hudelot , 2005). However preliminary examples of the use of spatial relations in a recognition task can be found for example in Colliot et al (2006);Cao (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional object detection algorithms usually scan the entire image using a multiscale sliding window; find the Region of Interest (ROI) [12] that may exist in the image; use the Scale-Invariant Feature Transformation (SIFT) [13], the Histogram of Oriented Gradient (HOG) [14], the Deformable Part-based Model (DPM) [15], the Local Binary Pattern (LBP) [16], and other algorithms to extract the expected features of the ROI; and, finally, use Support Vector Machine (SVM) [17][18][19], iterative adaptive boosting algorithm (Adaboost) [20], or other classifiers to classify and recognize the object. Expected features are generally defined artificially, such as edge, color, shape, and size [21][22][23][24]. The traditional object detection algorithms have pretty good accuracy in fixed scenes, but the accuracy depends on artificially designed features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%