2017
DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1354973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial reorientation decline in aging: the combination of geometry and landmarks

Abstract: The associative strength between landmark and target plays an important role in affecting spatial orientation performance of cognitively impaired participants. Geometry significantly supports landmark information and becomes helpful with the increase of cognitive impairment which is linked to a decrement in landmark encoding. VReoT seems to represent a reliable evaluation supplement for spatial orientation deficits in prodromal stages of dementia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Some scholars (Ishikawa & Montello, 2006; Thorndyke & Hayes-Roth, 1982; Wolbers & Hegarty, 2010) have already stated that learning from navigation requires a perspective change, translating procedural knowledge into survey knowledge and thus the chance of making mistakes in such spatial tasks is greater. Nonetheless, these findings contribute to support for the notion that familiarity with the environment protects elderly people from the effects of allocentric spatial memory decline, more likely due to the general difficulty of acquiring new information (Caffò et al, 2018; Iachini et al, 2009; Lopez et al, 2018; Lopez et al, 2019; Muffato et al, 2015). Moreover, the geographical arrangements of the Italy and the area of Bari are different.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Some scholars (Ishikawa & Montello, 2006; Thorndyke & Hayes-Roth, 1982; Wolbers & Hegarty, 2010) have already stated that learning from navigation requires a perspective change, translating procedural knowledge into survey knowledge and thus the chance of making mistakes in such spatial tasks is greater. Nonetheless, these findings contribute to support for the notion that familiarity with the environment protects elderly people from the effects of allocentric spatial memory decline, more likely due to the general difficulty of acquiring new information (Caffò et al, 2018; Iachini et al, 2009; Lopez et al, 2018; Lopez et al, 2019; Muffato et al, 2015). Moreover, the geographical arrangements of the Italy and the area of Bari are different.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Notwithstanding these age-related differences, it is important to mention that older participants achieved a high level of performance on the task and made few errors. It can be argued that this result stemmed from the simplicity of the virtual environment that contained a unique junction and three proximal landmarks (Moffat and Resnick, 2002 ; Caffò et al, 2018 ). Moreover, both place- and response-based strategies could be used to complete the task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State‐of‐the‐art‐knowledge emphasises that old age is associated with functional decline in several very basic aspects of cognition such as executive function, attention, verbal and visual explicit memory, working memory, processing speed, and spatial cognition. With increasing age, an ensemble of basic representations and mechanisms supporting visuospatial perception, mental imagery and rotation, spatial memory, and metric‐property processing are compromised (e.g., Burgess, 2008; Caffò et al, 2018; Iachini, Iavarone, Senese, Ruotolo, & Ruggiero, 2009; Klencklen, Desprès, & Dufour, 2012; Lopez, Caffò, Spano, & Bosco, 2019; Moffat, 2009; Park & Schwarz, 2000; Sapkota, van der Linde, & Pardhan, 2020; Serino, Morganti, Di Stefano, & Riva, 2015). The ability to manage egocentric and allocentric spatial representations (to locate objects in relation to and independently of bodily space, respectively) decreases with aging (for a review, Colombo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%