2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial representation of magnitude in gorillas and orangutans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, these biases could depend on continuous extents, which were not systematically controlled. A spatial representation of magnitude has been recently also found in gorillas and orangutans (Gazes, Diamond, Hope, Caillaud, Stoinski, & Hampton, ). Interestingly, however, even if present in most of the individuals the direction of the association was either left‐to‐right or right‐to‐left oriented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, these biases could depend on continuous extents, which were not systematically controlled. A spatial representation of magnitude has been recently also found in gorillas and orangutans (Gazes, Diamond, Hope, Caillaud, Stoinski, & Hampton, ). Interestingly, however, even if present in most of the individuals the direction of the association was either left‐to‐right or right‐to‐left oriented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Interestingly, however, even if present in most of the individuals the direction of the association was either left‐to‐right or right‐to‐left oriented. Differences in orientation do not appear to be due to species or handedness, but rather to idiosyncratic experiences such as the interactions with caregivers (Gazes et al ., ). Different evidence came from a study in cleaner fish: a lack of association between magnitudes and space was observed in this species that can be attributed to either experiential or evolutionary factors (Triki & Bshary, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such kind of control for extraneous variables co-varying with counting has already been done in studies on numerosity perception involving some invertebrates, vertebrates and humans. Some species tested for their numerosity abilities could be controlled for co-variates by the introduction of simple changes in the presented cues, such as varying their size (in a spider: Rodríguez, Briceño, Briceño-Aguilar, & Höbel, 2015; in chimpanzees: Tomonaga, 2008), as well as their pattern (in pigeons: Emmerton & Renner, 2006; in gorillas and orangutans: Gazes, Diamond, Hope, Caillaud, Stoinski, & Hampton, 2017), or for food items, by changing their nature (in a grey parrot: Pepperberg, 2012) or pictures representing them (in an elephant: Irie, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, & Kutsukake, 2019). Numerosity in other species was controlled for shape, size, brightness and location of presented cues (in a mosquito fish: Agrillo, Dadda, Serena, & Bisazza, 2009) or needed to be controlled with the help of time interval and dummies (in dogs and wolves: Range, Jenikejew, Schröder, & Virányi, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because this initial work dealt primarily with symbolic numerical stimuli ( Dehaene et al, 1993 ), and because it has since been shown that there is cross-cultural variation in the direction of these effects ( Zebian, 2005 ; Shaki et al, 2009 ), it was hypothesized that the mental number line arose from experience with linguistic conventions (i.e., reading and writing). Although cultural experience certainly modulates the directionality of one’s mental number line ( Shaki et al, 2009 ; McCrink et al, 2014 ), recent research using non-symbolic stimuli demonstrates directional effects in non-human animals ( Drucker and Brannon, 2014 ; Rugani et al, 2015 ) and preliterate children ( Patro and Haman, 2012 ; de Hevia et al, 2014 ), though the specific orientation of these directional effects may vary ( Cooperrider et al, 2017 ; Gazes et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%