2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02291.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial scale and the diversity of macroinvertebrates in a Neotropical catchment

Abstract: 1. Lotic ecosystems can be studied on several spatial scales, and usually show high heterogeneity at all of them in terms of biological and environmental characteristics. Understanding and predicting the taxonomic composition of biological communities is challenging and compounded by the problem of scale. Additive diversity partitioning is a tool that can show the diversity that occurs at different scales. 2. We evaluated the spatial distribution of benthic macroinvertebrates in a tropical headwater catchment … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
79
2
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(171 reference statements)
5
79
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The invertebrates were classified into functional feeding groups (FFG), gathering-collector, filtering-collector, predator, scraper and shredder, based on Brazilian and Neotropical literature (Fernández & Domínguez 2001, Cummins et al 2005, Costa et al 2006, Wantzen & Wagner 2006. For those taxa belonging to more than one functional group, the individuals were divided between each possible trophic category (Ligeiro et al 2010a). Nematoda, Diptera and Ostracoda were not classified due to their many feeding habits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The invertebrates were classified into functional feeding groups (FFG), gathering-collector, filtering-collector, predator, scraper and shredder, based on Brazilian and Neotropical literature (Fernández & Domínguez 2001, Cummins et al 2005, Costa et al 2006, Wantzen & Wagner 2006. For those taxa belonging to more than one functional group, the individuals were divided between each possible trophic category (Ligeiro et al 2010a). Nematoda, Diptera and Ostracoda were not classified due to their many feeding habits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attractiveness of a given leaf detritus for invertebrates depends on the chemical composition, physical structure, stage of microbial colonization and decomposition level of the detritus, which can vary with the exposure time in the aquatic environment (Ligeiro et al, 2010). Most studies in tropical streams has sought to expand the knowledge about the infl uence of interspecifi c variation in the quality of senescent detritus on the fragmentation by invertebrates, either for food or for producing larval case (Moretti et al, 2009;Navarro et al, 2013).…”
Section: Palavras-chavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several features allow this invasive species to dominate, including the capability of aestivating (Abílio et al 2007), tolerance to low dissolved-oxygen concentrations, high temperatures (Mitchell & Brandt 2005), and brackish and saline waters, and also because it can reproduce parthenogenetically (see references in Santos et al 2012). The dominance of M. tuberculata in rivers and reservoirs of semiarid regions in northeastern Brazil has been mentioned in the literature (e.g., Abílio et al 2006, Santana et al 2009, Lima et al 2013. Melanoides tuberculata is also considered to be responsible for the decline or extirpation of some native Brazilian species, such as members of Biomphalaria and Pomacea (see references and discussion in Vidigal et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Records of wide distribution of mollusk communities along rivers, as recorded in the present study, are rare in studies of macroinvertebrates conducted in many Brazilian regions, especially when the studies use a Surber sampler. In these cases, the malacofauna is generally undersampled, and the records indicate a much localized occurrence (e.g., Ligeiro et al 2010, Hepp et al 2010. Thus, the use of an inappropriate sampler to collect mollusks seems to not have affected knowledge of the diversity of the Contas River malacofauna.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%