2020
DOI: 10.1017/pab.2020.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial scaling of beta diversity in the shallow-marine fossil record

Abstract: Beta diversity quantifies the spatial structuring of ecological communities and is a fundamental partition of biodiversity, central to understanding many macroecological phenomena in modern biology and paleobiology. Despite its common application in ecology, studies of beta diversity in the fossil record are relatively limited at regional spatial scales that are important for understanding macroevolutionary processes. The spatial scaling of beta diversity in the fossil record is poorly understood, but has sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Diversity at the regional scale will be informative in determining specific drivers of, and biases in, the diversity signal (Crampton et al, 2003;Dunhill et al, 2012Dunhill et al, , 2013Dunhill et al, , 2014Close et al, 2020a), as will examining differences between diversity measures (e.g. alpha and beta diversity), which can also be spatially dependent (Womack, Crampton, & Hannah, 2021). Different spatial biases acting on the freshwater and marine records may also variably impact different diversity estimates, dependent on the attributes of the sampled regions (Lagomarcino & Miller, 2012).…”
Section: (B) Geographic and Spatial Biasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversity at the regional scale will be informative in determining specific drivers of, and biases in, the diversity signal (Crampton et al, 2003;Dunhill et al, 2012Dunhill et al, , 2013Dunhill et al, , 2014Close et al, 2020a), as will examining differences between diversity measures (e.g. alpha and beta diversity), which can also be spatially dependent (Womack, Crampton, & Hannah, 2021). Different spatial biases acting on the freshwater and marine records may also variably impact different diversity estimates, dependent on the attributes of the sampled regions (Lagomarcino & Miller, 2012).…”
Section: (B) Geographic and Spatial Biasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, regional and local assemblages are located in space, with definable geographic scale and (paleo)geographic locations. This information allows tests of the influence of regional environment on diversity, quantification of species-area relationships 38 or hierarchical beta diversity 40,108 and characterization of the latitudinal biodiversity gradient in deep time 31 .…”
Section: Local Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, although studies of this type have yielded important hypotheses regarding the drivers of global biodiversity, spatially explicit studies may ultimately be required to test them further, potentially teasing apart the effects of linked Earth system drivers at nested spatial scales. These studies may include comparison of regional environmental variables with regional patterns of diversity or diversification rates within and across time periods 125 , and quantification of species-area relationships and beta diversity at varying spatial scales as an approach to quantifying provinciality 40 .…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To estimate spatial area, we generated an equal-area penta-hexagrid (side of 23 km) using the R package icosa (Kocsis 2020). We assigned each fossil collection to a grid-cell based on their paleocoordinates, following the protocol in Womack et al (2020b) The functional redundancy relationship for each time bin was generated by plotting species and functional richness recorded at equal summed MST lengths (see Fig. 7.6 and Fig.…”
Section: Estimating Areamentioning
confidence: 99%