2022
DOI: 10.3390/su14106195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Simulation of Land-Use Development of Feixi County, China, Based on Optimized Productive–Living–Ecological Functions

Abstract: Rural revitalization places higher demands on the productive–living–ecological (P-L-E) spaces of towns and cities. It is necessary, therefore, to identify, evaluate, and optimize P-L-E spaces to better guide spatial planning. Existing studies typically evaluate a single space, lacking a comprehensive consideration of whole-area integration. This study, therefore, developed a coupled spatial/developmental suitability evaluation system for Feixi County, Anhui Province, China, combining spatial quality evaluation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To model various land use processes and their interactions, several widely used CA aggregation models have been developed, including Logistic-CA, artificial neural networks-CA (ANN-CA), CA-Markov, and Future Land Use Simulation (FLUS) [15][16][17][18][19]. The FLUS model incorporates the influence of natural factors and is a top-down quantitative estimation method [20][21][22]. However, the previous models still have limitations in simulating different land class processes and capturing complex spatial interactions and internal mechanisms between individual land classes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To model various land use processes and their interactions, several widely used CA aggregation models have been developed, including Logistic-CA, artificial neural networks-CA (ANN-CA), CA-Markov, and Future Land Use Simulation (FLUS) [15][16][17][18][19]. The FLUS model incorporates the influence of natural factors and is a top-down quantitative estimation method [20][21][22]. However, the previous models still have limitations in simulating different land class processes and capturing complex spatial interactions and internal mechanisms between individual land classes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling of the GeoSOS-FLUS model and Markov chain model as well as the simulation process is shown in Figure 1. The combination of the two models makes the FLUS model able to handle complex spatial change while the Markov chain model predicts land quantity, thus realizing the full exploitation of spatial and quantitative information on the dynamic evolution of land use [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated by [4], the success of the majority of mankind s undertakings depends on a sound governance of their financial, institutional, and especially physical layer perceptron neural network considering population density, topographic features, and proximity variables. ANN-based CA models also include works at regional scales relying on the FLUS platform, which operates with the concept of adaptive inertia mechanism and employs a roulette wheel selection [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%