Proceedings of the 29th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 201 2016
DOI: 10.33012/2016.14783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Spoofing Signal Suppression Using the Constellation Covariance Matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6b shows the mean and standard deviation of the angle between the estimated and expected DOAs averaged over 60 snapshots. The satellite constellation is depicted from Figure 4b, where 7 Sats depicts the subset (1,3,6,8,9,10,17), 9 Sats depicts the subset (1,3,6,8,9,10,17,23,25) and 11 Sats includes all satellites. The performance with only 7 satellites in view is already very well with an error of only around 2 • .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 6b shows the mean and standard deviation of the angle between the estimated and expected DOAs averaged over 60 snapshots. The satellite constellation is depicted from Figure 4b, where 7 Sats depicts the subset (1,3,6,8,9,10,17), 9 Sats depicts the subset (1,3,6,8,9,10,17,23,25) and 11 Sats includes all satellites. The performance with only 7 satellites in view is already very well with an error of only around 2 • .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out that antenna calibration is still a major challenge. Therefore many research studies came up with so-called blind interference and / or spoofing countermeasures, that do not rely on calibration [1][2][3]. Although they are not complicated in terms of implementation and complexity and provide good results in most scenarios, they may degrade receiver performance by accidentally nullifying or attenuating authentic signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%