2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00096-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
263
4
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
31
263
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A forward masking subtraction method (e.g., Abbas et al 1999) was used to remove electrical stimulus artifacts while preserving neural responses. To determine the spread of neural excitation for steered pTP stimuli, the ECAP spatial profile (e.g., Cohen et al 2003) was measured by keeping the steered pTP-mode probe on EL8 (i.e., pTP EL8, α = 0 , pTP EL8, α = 0.5 , and pTP EL8, α = 1 ) while moving the MP-mode masker along the electrode array from EL1 to EL16. Both probe and masker used a biphasic cathodic-leading, charge-balanced pulse.…”
Section: Ecap: Stimuli and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A forward masking subtraction method (e.g., Abbas et al 1999) was used to remove electrical stimulus artifacts while preserving neural responses. To determine the spread of neural excitation for steered pTP stimuli, the ECAP spatial profile (e.g., Cohen et al 2003) was measured by keeping the steered pTP-mode probe on EL8 (i.e., pTP EL8, α = 0 , pTP EL8, α = 0.5 , and pTP EL8, α = 1 ) while moving the MP-mode masker along the electrode array from EL1 to EL16. Both probe and masker used a biphasic cathodic-leading, charge-balanced pulse.…”
Section: Ecap: Stimuli and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial profile of ECAP (e.g., Cohen et al 2003;Hughes and Abbas 2006) shows the spread of excitation for the probe by assessing the spatial and temporal interactions between the neurons activated by the masker and probe (due to the neural refractory effects). While ECAP patterns have been studied extensively for MP stimuli, those for focused TP stimuli have only been reported by Zhu et al (2012) to be irregular with multiple peaks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it must be emphasized that electrode spacing is an extremely complex issue and many other factors must be considered in defining the optimum electrode spacing. Many investigators have noted extensive channel interactions in CI users (Cohen et al 2003;Stickney et al 2006), and closer electrode spacing might exacerbate this problem. Computer modeling studies also suggest that dynamic range and spatial selectivity for apical electrodes (1.5 cochlear turns) are often limited due to cross-turn stimulation (Briaire and Frijns 2006).…”
Section: Frequency-position Map Of Human Sgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that estimates of intracochlear electrode positions based on analysis of either 2D radiographs or CT scans are more accurate than those based on absolute insertion depth, as reported during surgery (Marsh et al 1993;Cohen et al 1996;Xu et al 2000). Furthermore, Boex et al found that using rotational insertion angles, rather than absolute insertion depths, to estimate electrode frequencies resulted in less discrepancy between pitch sensations and the frequencies predicted by Greenwood_s function.…”
Section: Electrode Insertion Distances and Sg And Oc Place Frequenciementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more straightforward way to explain the variable perceptual data is to directly estimate the excitation patterns of steered pTP stimuli with different α in each subject. This can be achieved by measuring the forward masking patterns of steered pTP stimuli using psychophysical methods (e.g., Chatterjee and Shannon 1998; Kwon and van den Honert 2006b; Srinivasan et al 2010;Landsberger et al 2012) or using electrically evoked compound action potentials (e.g., Cohen et al 2003;Hughes and Stille 2008).…”
Section: General Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%