2008
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Targeted Vector Control Is Able to Reduce Malaria Prevalence in the Highlands of Burundi

Abstract: Abstract. In a highland province of Burundi, indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticidal net distribution were targeted in the valley, aiming also to protect the population living on the hilltops. The impact on malaria indicators was assessed, and the potential additional effect of nets evaluated. After the intervention-and compared with the control valleys-children 1-9 years old in the treated valleys had lower risks of malaria infection (odds ratio,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another observational study from western Kenya, in a setting with high transmission intensity and moderate ITN coverage, two rounds of IRS with pyrethroid insecticides was associated with a lower odds of parasitemia from cross-sectional surveys compared to ITNs alone [39]. In contrast, observational studies from Eritrea and Burundi demonstrated a protective effect of IRS and ITNs when used together, but failed to show any added benefit of the combination compared to either intervention alone [40,41]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another observational study from western Kenya, in a setting with high transmission intensity and moderate ITN coverage, two rounds of IRS with pyrethroid insecticides was associated with a lower odds of parasitemia from cross-sectional surveys compared to ITNs alone [39]. In contrast, observational studies from Eritrea and Burundi demonstrated a protective effect of IRS and ITNs when used together, but failed to show any added benefit of the combination compared to either intervention alone [40,41]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27][28][29] Three studies did not measure human health outcomes. [30][31][32] Two studies did not measure a change caused by IRS but rather established a baseline prevalence rate 33 or a change over time after termination of IRS. 34 Two studies reported the same data but with a different focus of analysis; one was included 35 and the other was excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these reports have come from island communities, 4,5 relatively low seasonal transmission settings in Southern Africa, [6][7][8] or epidemic-prone highland areas. 9 In addition, they were based on specifically designed comparisons of pre-and post-intervention data from cross-sectional surveys or retrospective analysis of health facility records. Our surveillance system has the advantage of using available quality data with minimal additional investment for assessing the impact of not only IRS, but other population-level interventions as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%