2006
DOI: 10.1256/wea.106.06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial temperature variation in the Eastern Pyrenees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
45
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…reception of solar radiation, shading, control on air flow), albedo (e.g. percentage vegetation, snow cover), and primary synoptic conditions (see also Pepin and Kidd, 2006), which in many instances interact or dominate over the site-specific factors. The locality of a major escarpment wall (several hundred kilometers in length and ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…reception of solar radiation, shading, control on air flow), albedo (e.g. percentage vegetation, snow cover), and primary synoptic conditions (see also Pepin and Kidd, 2006), which in many instances interact or dominate over the site-specific factors. The locality of a major escarpment wall (several hundred kilometers in length and ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although relatively few studies have investigated the influence of synoptic variability on lapse rates, it is an important factor to consider given its control on radiative exchange and mixing (Pepin and Kidd, 2006). Typical synoptic patterns that impact the annual climate of the Drakensberg escarpment, as classified by Tyson and Preston-Whyte (2000), include tropical temperature troughs, east coast low pressure systems, and southeast coast ridging high pressure systems that are most dominant during warmer seasons, whilst westerlies, high pressure systems over the interior, cold fronts, and ridging high pressure systems behind cold fronts are most dominant during the cooler seasons.…”
Section: Synoptic Conditions and Temperature Lapse Rates In 2001mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, on stable nights, this assumption is unrealistic and may introduce substantial errors into downscaled temperatures; numerous studies draw attention to the variability of lapse rates of near-surface temperature in complex terrain in the United Kingdom (e.g. Pepin et al, 1999;Pepin, 2001) and elsewhere (Pepin and Kidd, 2006;Marshall et al, 2007, and references therein). For a height difference of 50 m between the model and real terrain, a modest inversion with, say, γ = −0.0100°C m −1 , will lead to an error ≈1°C being introduced by a height correction which assumes γ is equal to the dry adiabatic lapse rate (DALR), γ 0 = 0.0098°C m −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This facilitates persistence of snow over the mountain slopes and glaciers for longer period during these post-winter months. SELR variations could also be influenced by factors such as land surface conditions (Pepin and Losleben, 2002;Pepin and Kidd, 2006). However, Kirchner et al (2013) found no significance difference between snow and no snow cover days in lapse rate based on daily mean temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…What is required for a snow/glacier model is a SELR model, which delivers the higher elevation temperature distribution based on a single base station temperature data at the lower elevation. Following manifestation of the Clausius-Clapeyron relationship is found to be appropriate for this purpose 25 (Peixoto and Oort, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%