2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-021-01547-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Tools for Integrated and Inclusive Landscape Governance: Toward a New Research Agenda

Abstract: Participatory spatial tools—community mapping, PGIS, and others—find increasing resonance among research and non-governmental organizations to make stakeholder claims and community perspectives explicit for more inclusive landscape governance. In this paper, we situate the use of participatory spatial tools in debates on integrated landscape approaches and inclusive development. We show that using such spatial tools is not new but argue that their application for inclusive landscape governance requires a new r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are fundamentally strategies that attempt to enhance landscape governance and are therefore concerned with interactions of people, power, and politics across multiple scales of influence [21,[46][47][48]. For example, ILAs tend to have multiple objectives and lean towards enhancing landscape multifunctionality through regular stakeholder engagement, often through a dedicated multi-stakeholder platform [49][50][51][52]. By spanning sectorial and governance levels, ILAs also aim to be more inclusive with an emphasis on collective action, participatory monitoring, and regular reflection of progress and continual learning through the application of adaptive comanagement [27,49,53].…”
Section: The Concept Of Integrated Landscape Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are fundamentally strategies that attempt to enhance landscape governance and are therefore concerned with interactions of people, power, and politics across multiple scales of influence [21,[46][47][48]. For example, ILAs tend to have multiple objectives and lean towards enhancing landscape multifunctionality through regular stakeholder engagement, often through a dedicated multi-stakeholder platform [49][50][51][52]. By spanning sectorial and governance levels, ILAs also aim to be more inclusive with an emphasis on collective action, participatory monitoring, and regular reflection of progress and continual learning through the application of adaptive comanagement [27,49,53].…”
Section: The Concept Of Integrated Landscape Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the critical role actor perceptions of landscape dynamics and participatory and spatial tools play in achieving sustainable and inclusive landscape governance (Ros-Tonen and Willemen 2021 ; Ros-Tonen et al 2021 ) and considering the research gap in sub-Saharan Africa and Ghana, this study aims to apply land users’ collective perceptions to simulate the impact of future land-use change scenarios on the provision of locally relevant ESs in southwestern Ghana. The study landscape is known for expanding rubber plantations through out-grower schemes and settlement expansions resulting from oil discovery and mining development (Bugri and Yeboah 2017 ; Asante-Yeboah et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aligned with this proposition, our participative approach consists of semi-quantitative assessments – ranking of FES’ importance to the SDGs, and weighting of their interactions – enabling us to output explicit perceptions from the actors involved, i.e., their representation of how the system works. Such participatory mapping tools show great potential to facilitate integrated and inclusive landscape governance (Ros-Tonen et al 2021 ), and are increasingly needed to produce relevant system knowledge (Magliocca et al 2018 ) – which is especially crucial in landscapes with socially contested land claims (Meyfroidt et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%