Spatial-topographic nestedness of interoceptive regions within the networks of decision making and emotion regulation: Combining ALE meta-analysis and MACM analysis

Tan, Yafei; Yan, Rong; Gao, Yuan; Zhang, Meng; Northoff, Georg

doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119500

Cited by 13 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 100 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Referring to the emotional functioning, empirical evidence has demonstrated that the dACC is a key region involved in threat and noxious stimuli appraisal 100 and it supports the expressions of negative affective states (e.g., fear), 101 especially experiences of pain 102 and related emotional components. 103 Moreover, a recent fMRI meta-analysis 104 showed a key role of dACC in connection with right anterior insula (as part of the salience network) on the functional relationship between interoception and ER. Taken these findings together, the key role of dACC in the whole DS suggests an abnormal detected internal-external salience in response to emotional stimuli.…”

Section: Ptsd Related To Single Nonrelational Traumatic Experiencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neural responses to emotional stimuli across the dissociative spectrum: Common and specific mechanisms

Cavicchioli

Ogliari

Maffei

et al. 2023

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: Departing from existing neurobiological models of dissociation, the current study aims at conducting a quantitative meta-analytic review of neural responses to emotional stimuli among individuals ascribed to the dissociative spectrum (DS). Accordingly, the study explored common and specific brain mechanisms across borderline personality disorder, conversion/somatoform disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder related to repeated interpersonal traumatic experiences, and dissociative disorders.Methods: The meta-analysis included studies that administered emotional stimuli during functional magnetic resonance imaging acquisition among individuals included in the DS. There were two conducted meta-analytic procedures: (i) a Bayesian network meta-analysis for a region-of-interestbased approach; and (ii) robust voxel-based approach.Results: Forty-four independent studies were included for a total of 1384 individuals (DS = 741 patients). The network meta-analysis showed specific patterns of neural activity considering an extended brain network involved in emotion regulation for each condition ascribed to the DS. The voxelbased meta-analysis highlighted an increased activity of dorsal anterior cingulate cortex as a common neurological signature of the DS. Conclusion:The common neural feature of the DS captures an implicit appraisal of emotion-eliciting stimuli as threatening and/or noxious for mental and physical integrity of the individual together with painful subjective experiences associated with physiological emotional reactions. Specific brain responses across the DS suggested the engagement in different mechanisms to address emotional stimuli, including implicit avoidance reactions and attempts to overcontrol of affective states together with a disruption of integrative processes of emotional mind-body features.

show abstract

Section: Ptsd Related To Single Nonrelational Traumatic Experiencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neural responses to emotional stimuli across the dissociative spectrum: Common and specific mechanisms

Cavicchioli

Ogliari

Maffei

et al. 2023

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, if people can imagine the results of doing or not doing certain actions (decision‐making), they may be able to use it as a means to regulate their emotions. Further, Tan et al (2022) also reported that there are major overlaps of interoception with both emotion regulation and decision‐making, especially in the right dorsal anterior insula. However, this finding is inconsistent with the initial validation of the FoFTS in an English‐speaking sample, in which correlations between these scales were considerably lower ( r < .40).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functions of episodic future thinking: A validation and comparative study across individuals with normal versus pathological worry

Akbari,

Jamshidi,

Seydavi

et al. 2023

Applied Cognitive Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Future thinking is the ability to mentally simulate future scenarios, events, or circumstances that one might be personally involved in. The present study sought to evaluate the Persian version of the Functions of Future Thinking Scale (FoFTS) in a large sample of the Iranian general population and to compare individuals with normal versus pathological worry. The Persian FoFTS had an acceptable 10‐factor structure and the reliability index of all factors was within an acceptable range. The validity was explored in terms of temporal distance of future thinking, past (positive and negative) thinking, self‐efficacy, affect (positive and negative), and mindset (pessimism and optimism). Individuals with pathological worry scored significantly higher on seven functions of future thinking (boredom reduction, death preparation, negative regulation, social bonding, planning, problem‐solving, and decision‐making) compared to individuals with normal worry, and they did not differ on three functions of future thinking (identity contrast, goal setting, and positive regulation).

show abstract

“…These regions are collectively involved in a number of specific functions closely associated with emotional processing, particularly in more anterior portions (96, 97). They also play an important role in self-related processing in general and self-related emotional processing in particular (76, 77, 98, 99). In addition to the insula, the second set of co-activated networks included the pallidum, putamen, thalamus, and ventral tegmental area (Figure 3c).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Individual differences in wellbeing are supported by separable sets of co-active self- and visual-attention-related brain networks

Ma,

Skipper

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How does the brain support 'wellbeing'? Because it is a multidimensional construct, it is likely the product of multiple co-active brain networks that vary across individuals. This is perhaps why prior neuroimaging studies have found inconsistent anatomical associations with wellbeing. Furthermore, these used 'laboratory-style' or 'resting-state' methods not amenable to finding manifold networks. To address these issues, we had participants watch a full-length romantic comedy-drama film during functional magnetic resonance imaging. We hypothesised that individual differences in wellbeing measured before scanning would be correlated with individual differences in brain networks associated with 'embodied' and 'narrative' self-related processing. Indeed, searchlight spatial inter-participant representational similarity and subsequent analyses revealed seven sets of co-activated networks associated with individual differences in wellbeing. Two were 'embodied self' related, including brain regions associated with autonomic and affective processing. Three sets were 'narrative self' related, involving speech, language, and autobiographical memory related regions. Finally, two sets of visual-attention related networks emerged. These results suggest that the neurobiology of wellbeing in the real-world is supported by diverse but functionally definable and separable sets of networks. This has implications for psychotherapy where individualised interventions might target, e.g., neuroplasticity in language-related narrative over embodied self or visual-attentional related processes.

show abstract

Spatial-topographic nestedness of interoceptive regions within the networks of decision making and emotion regulation: Combining ALE meta-analysis and MACM analysis

Cited by 13 publications

References 100 publications

Neural responses to emotional stimuli across the dissociative spectrum: Common and specific mechanisms

Neural responses to emotional stimuli across the dissociative spectrum: Common and specific mechanisms

Functions of episodic future thinking: A validation and comparative study across individuals with normal versus pathological worry

Individual differences in wellbeing are supported by separable sets of co-active self- and visual-attention-related brain networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About