2012
DOI: 10.1134/s1995425512010018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial-typological organization of animal assemblages (results and conclusions)

Abstract: The results of studies in factor zoogeography performed by the Laboratory of Zoological Monitoring (Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS) over 50 years are briefly reported. The review deals with the distribution and abundance of terrestrial animals, changes in the shape of their assemblages in the West Siberian Plain, Altai, and adjacent areas, and faunal zonation of Northern Eurasia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Th is technique allowed obtaining information on the abundance and distribution of birds rapidly, simultaneously covering diff erent habitats and landscapes as well as individual subregions. In open landscapes, the birds are better recorded on automobile routes (Cheltsov-Bebutov, 1959) with a broken trajectory, due to higher representativeness of transects and comparability of results than in the control sites, thus making them the closest to random sample distribution (Ravkin, Livanov, 2009). Th e routes were selected freely, not in homogenous habitats (like forest tracts), or areas adjacent to them (the shores of large water bodies), which made it possible to equally count birds from diff erent ecological groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th is technique allowed obtaining information on the abundance and distribution of birds rapidly, simultaneously covering diff erent habitats and landscapes as well as individual subregions. In open landscapes, the birds are better recorded on automobile routes (Cheltsov-Bebutov, 1959) with a broken trajectory, due to higher representativeness of transects and comparability of results than in the control sites, thus making them the closest to random sample distribution (Ravkin, Livanov, 2009). Th e routes were selected freely, not in homogenous habitats (like forest tracts), or areas adjacent to them (the shores of large water bodies), which made it possible to equally count birds from diff erent ecological groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%