2016
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/11/115503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial uniformity of the current emitted by an array of passively fed electrospray porous emitters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…was lower than −87 V or higher than 89 V, the collector current began to be detected and reached −1.0 A at −92 V and 0.6 A at 92 V. Since the starting voltage of ion extraction is a function of the surface tension of the ionic liquid, the curvature radius of the emitter tip, and the distance between the emitters and the extractor, 30) the absolute value of the starting voltage is estimated to be approximately equal for both cation and anion extraction, which was true for the present experiments and the previous ones. 17,21,31) We could demonstrate that ions were extracted from the sub-m scale capillaries of the high-density emitter array when EMI-DCA was utilized as the propellant. Note that the sum of the extractor current and the collector current was approximately equal to the emitter current, indicating the current conservation via emitted ions, and thus the plots of the emitter current at the voltage amplitude of 92 V were out of range of the graph.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…was lower than −87 V or higher than 89 V, the collector current began to be detected and reached −1.0 A at −92 V and 0.6 A at 92 V. Since the starting voltage of ion extraction is a function of the surface tension of the ionic liquid, the curvature radius of the emitter tip, and the distance between the emitters and the extractor, 30) the absolute value of the starting voltage is estimated to be approximately equal for both cation and anion extraction, which was true for the present experiments and the previous ones. 17,21,31) We could demonstrate that ions were extracted from the sub-m scale capillaries of the high-density emitter array when EMI-DCA was utilized as the propellant. Note that the sum of the extractor current and the collector current was approximately equal to the emitter current, indicating the current conservation via emitted ions, and thus the plots of the emitter current at the voltage amplitude of 92 V were out of range of the graph.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A at 900 V with the same ionic liquid of EMI-DCA, 17,31) resulting in the current density of −0.31 mA/cm 2 at −900 V and 0.25 mA/cm 2 at 900V. In comparison, our high-density emitter array obtained a few times higher current density for both polarities than the S-iEPS and showed a similar tendency that the anion produced higher absolute value of the current than the cation at the same absolute value of the emitter voltage owing to the lighter mass of DCA (66 g/mol)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in the devices presented here, 100's of emission sites are likely present over the emitter arrays each making a small contribution towards the total beam current and characterized by an onset field (/voltage) dependent on local conditions. At a single polarity and emitting 100's of µA, individual emission site onset and collapse is likely to occur during beam current amplitude modulation yet at sufficiently distributed potentials to avoid large, discreet, steps in current [32]. Regardless, minimum onset times may differ between polarities (as observed in Ref.…”
Section: Active Charge Neutralizationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For an array of 480 porous emitters, measurements of the spatial uniformity and estimations of the fraction of tips emitting have been reported by MIT. 90 The propellant in this device was supplied passively, 91 and the thruster was operated in an ambipolar mode with a change in polarity every thirty seconds. Whether the alternating ambipolar operation of an entire microthruster array is preferable to the parallel operation of two microthruster arrays of opposite polarity, possibly also operated alternatingly, 92 is a topic currently under investigation.…”
Section: -13mentioning
confidence: 99%