1995
DOI: 10.1016/0933-3630(95)00005-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variability of penetration data on Russian plots in different land use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with Meshalkina et al (1995), who found asynchronous changes of averages and standard deviations accompanied by a change of distribution of soil penetrability. Likewise, Kutiel et al (2000) described non-linear relationships between the variances of organic matter, soil moisture, and penetration depth and the averages in areas under visitors' pressure.…”
Section: Variability Of Soil Propertiessupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is in agreement with Meshalkina et al (1995), who found asynchronous changes of averages and standard deviations accompanied by a change of distribution of soil penetrability. Likewise, Kutiel et al (2000) described non-linear relationships between the variances of organic matter, soil moisture, and penetration depth and the averages in areas under visitors' pressure.…”
Section: Variability Of Soil Propertiessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It was dried for 24 h at 70°C and weighed. Soil surface compaction by means of penetration depth of a stick thrust into the soil by means a weight (235 g) dropped from the top of the stick (50 cm high) towards its base (Karpachevsky et al 1980;Meshalkina et al 1995) was measured in all sampling points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Penetrometers with a 2-kg hammer and standardized cone tip dimensions have been proposed for agricultural soils (Herrick and Jones, 2002;Vanags et al, 2004). Meshalkina et al (1995) proposed a pocket instrument with a 50-g hammer and a flat tip to explore the first 5 cm of the soil, but the limitation in the depth explored and the lack of a standardized cone tip make it difficult to compare measurements with other devices. There are no reports in the literature that explicitly propose and validate penetrometers for forest soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%